Posted by docarzt on Monday, March 9th, 2009 at 10:10 am - filed under Easter Eggs - (93) Comments
Want TV News? Visit TVOvermind.comThanks to reader Bobby for pointing this out. As far as I know, no-one else has made this connection. At the very end of the comic con ‘08 Pierre Chang film, when Chang is struggling with who we assume to be Faraday, the final thing he says is “LaFleur, what are you doing?”













Microsoft Store
Wow, that’s awesome! Nice catch.
He doesn’t say LaFleur, but he does say JIM!!!!
The video is no longer available:(
Definitely did not hear “LaFleur” in that. Not at all.
Im with Rich – didnt hear it.
Seconded. It sounds more like “no, what – what are you doing?” to me.
It’s possible he said LaFleur, but that’s a big stretch. I’m way more likely to believe he said, “No, wha what are you doing?” Especially considering the stuttering that was going on in those final seconds.
Yea.. .can you put a timestamp (minute second mark) where you heard that? b/c I didn’t either.
Neither did I. Listened several times.
definitely didn’t hear it.
I definitely hear him say “no, what – what are you doing?”, but then at 2:44 it sounds to me like he says LaFleur.
Though I have heard this mentioned before on other message boards.
Yeo what you said, just before it cuts it sounds like LaFleur to me!
It’s hardly distinct. I can sort of hear it, but not for sure.
He did not say Lafleur and that is definately not Sawyer’s voice so why would he say Lafleur.
It’s Dan’s voice. But Sawyer could conceivably be there.
no it’s dan’s voice
he says LaFleur….100%
AHHHH damn youtube and being at work!!! I can’t see it. Can someone post it elsewhere for me? PUH LEEZE!!!!
lyly always here^^
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x6f8xi_comic-con-08-secret-candle_creation
Thanks, Lyly. I knew you’d help me out.
I hear LaFleur… and yes he’s talking to Dan it would seem. Maybe they originally were going to rename Dan LaFleur? Or are we supposed to assume Sawyer was their as well?
Pay close attention, there are two people in that room. I hear two voices early that sound like Daniel and Sawyer.
I hear those same two voices too mr. congested. I might suspect that daniel and sawyer both have talked to the doctor. At some point one of the future losties is going to have to tell one of the DI about them. My only question is how will they affect the past?
meh…lafleur or not, we should be considering what Pierre means by reconstituting the Dharma Initiative.
Thank you for bringing the discussion into focus. We already know that Dan and Sawyer are in the 70’s and a part of the Dharma Initiative on one level or another, so whether Sawyer is in the room or not seems to be a mute point.
A “mute” point or a “moot” point. Just wondering.
how about “silly”?
What was the Dharma’s initiative? We will have to know this if we are to reconstitute it. However Chang said time was not of the essence. Time was the essence. So there’s no sense in worrying about it now.
WTF??? What planet are we on? Oh, this isn’t a message board for American Idol?
sorry!
Seriously dude? Go to lostpedia and do some homework.
I was being facetious. Definition: 1 : joking or jesting often inappropriately. 2 : meant to be humorous or funny : not serious.
Lostipedia is not “just” of the essence, it “is” the essence.
Thanks dolce.
sounds like defintley dan, and maybe sawyer too, and it does sound like he says la fleur!!
Not that it matters since we know Sawyer is on the island in Dharma time, but there is no way that he says “Lafleur” in the video. Not even close. “No, wai–, what are you doing?!” How that is “Lafleur, what are you doing?!” I have no idea…
He does say “No wai- what are you doing?” but that is before he says “La Fleur, what are you doing?”. Listen at the very end of the transmission, right before they cut away from Chang; it’s almost certainly “La Fleur” there.
It does matter. If he said “LaFleur” at Comic Con LAST YEAR, then either the writers are really cool and way ahead of things, or they traveled back in time and re-recorded that message to fit it in with last week’s episode! Either way what’s it have to do with American Idol, neoloki?
it’s not that they’ve suddenly gotten lucky and are way ahead of things…they just know what they’re doing and have a studio backed end date. the show’s in the can man…sit back and let darlton blow our minds.
Exactly. The writers know what they’re doing. They’ve known the basic story arc since the beginning. I think it’s totally realistic that last year they knew they were going to send Sawyer back in time and change his name to LaFleur.
That said, I still don’t 100% hear it.
You guys are nuts…he is not saying “Lafleur” anywhere in there at the end. Get 5 non-LOST buddies and they’ll all confirm.
I don’t know why you’re replying to me. As I said above, “It’s hardly distinct. I can sort of hear it, but not for sure.”
At the VERY end of the video, for those who missed it, he distinctly says “La Fleur, what are you doing.” Good find.
We don’t need to hear his voice for him to have been there too.
Retraction: Chang says that time is not “just” of the essence, it is the essence. With that said, I guess we should start worrying about it now. Of course after we watch American Idol, right neoloki?
Just in case: this was facetious also.
If you think you heard ‘LaFleur’ than you also heard me pimp slap you upside the face. He doesnt say ‘LaFleur’…
looooooooooooooooooooooool
That is so very funny. I laughed out loud in my office and my assistant asked me what was so funny… awkward. Okay, not really – she didn’t ask me what was so funny… she didn’t even hear me… but it WOULD have been awkward.
Here is the video’s transcript which appears on the Lostpedia web site:
“
DR. CHANG: Hello. My name is Dr. Marvin Candle, and I….you know what? Forget it. No point in games anymore, right? (infant begins to cry off-screen) If you’re watching this now, you already know that my name – my real name is Pierre Chang and I… (Baby’s cries off-screen grow louder and Chang looks over. He gets up from the couch.)
DR. CHANG: Dammit Lara, just take him outside, please! I have one chance at this. (Chang sits back down.) [static]
DR. CHANG: [static] I am the professor of theoretical astrophysics from Ann Arbor, Michigan. I was brought to this… [static] godforsaken island years ago, to conduct experiments to study the Kerr metric solution of the Einstein field equations, and to… [static] If I can keep this pinhole open long enough, you should be receiving my message roughly thirty years… [static] If you’re listening now… [static] The American president is a man named George W. Bush, you share digital information instantaneously on something called “Internet” and, unfortunately, my colleagues and I are all dead [static] a kind of… [static], of violent purge. One that we are, apparently, powerless to escape. (Chang looks down sadly at his left arm, and grasps it with his right hand.)
DR. CHANG:: [static] This information comes to me from a source that has proven himself to be credible.
OFF-SCREEN VOICE: None of that matters. It doesn’t matter. Just get to it. Please! [static]
DR. CHANG:: Regardless, (another male voice in static) if this transmission is successful, it’s proof the work I’ve been doing here is valid. This place, it has extraordinary properties. I’m begging you, no matter what’s happened, it’s imperative that the DHARMA Initiative be reconstituted. You have to convince the researchers [static] and you have to do it now. Time is not just of the essence, it is the essence. Perhaps you’ll be able to find a way to save us, to change the past and to… [static] Please, please! You have to stop what’s about to happen, you can’t let us…[static]
OFF-SCREEN VOICE: This is useless! Alright? It’s just useless. They’ll never gonna see this, Pierre. How do I turn this off?
DR. CHANG: No, no! W-w-what are you doing?
OFF-SCREEN VOICE How do you turn it off?
DR. CHANG: No! LaFleur, what are you doing? [static]
When was it last edited? I would bet it’s within the last few days. I kinda hope it’s been like that for a while though. It would be cool if that was in there, but I won’t confuse hope for likelihood.
everyone knows that wikipedia, and therefore by extension lostpedia, is a fountain of incorrect information. anyone can edit it, so it can’t be trusted. i’m with horselover – you’d need to know when it was last edited.
Ok, to clear things up. Definitely hear him say LaFleur. First he says “what-what are you doing?” and from the video up top he says it at 2:39. Then at the very end you can hear him say “LaFleur! What are you doing?” and he says that at 2:40. If that video dissappears again, let me know and I’ll post the footage I filmed. It’s pretty much raw footage and the crowd hasn’t been cut out, but you can still hear the video fine.
Dharma “reconstituted”.
Sounds like a job for a doctor – Sawyer and juliet – and maybe a theoretical physicist – Daniel.
Or, Event reconstruction
For the reconstruction of events in criminal investigation, see Reconstruction (criminal investigation).
In a particle detector experiment, event reconstruction is the process of interpreting the electronic signals produced by the detector to determine the original particles that passed through, their momenta, directions, and the primary vertex of the event. Thus the initial physical process that occurred at the interaction point of the particle accelerator, whose study is the ultimate goal of the experiment, can be determined. The total event reconstruction is rarely possible (and rarely necessary); usually, only some part of the data described above is obtained and processed.
Can the past be changed? Was the reason the OS6 couldn’t leave was they are essential in stopping Ben (then why would he bring them back – ’cause you can’t change the past) and the Others.
He is saying “The Door! What are you doing?”
He is referrign to the Pin Hole, the window he has opened to send this message to the future.
Faraday doesnt think it will work, and starts to shutdowm, when Dr Chang gets excited, “The Door! (The window to send the transmission) What are you doin!”
Its amazing what people will allow themselves to hear. The should create a hatch to study perception and how people can be tricked into hearing what they want to hear.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kerr_metric
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frame_dragging
please read so interesting…
Although the Kerr solution appears to be singular at the roots of Λ = 0, these are actually coordinate singularities, and, with an appropriate choice of new coordinates, the Kerr solution can be smoothly extended through the values of r corresponding to these roots. The larger of these roots determines the location of the event horizon, and the smaller determines the location of a Cauchy horizon. A (future-directed, time-like) curve can start in the exterior and pass through the event horizon. Once having passed thrugh the event horizon, the r coordinate now behaves like a time coordinate, so it must decrease until the curve passes through the Cauchy horizon.
The region beyond the Cauchy horizon has several surprising features. The r coordinate again behaves like a spatial coordinate and can vary freely. The interior region has a reflection symmetry, so that a (future-directed time-like) curve may continue along a symmetric path, which continues through a second Cauchy horizon, through a second event horizon, and out into a new exterior region which is isometric to the original exterior region of the Kerr solution. The curve could then escape to infinity in the new region or enter the future event horizon of the new exterior region and repeat the process. This second exterior is sometimes thought of as another universe. On the other hand, in the Kerr solution, the singularity at r = 0 is a ring, and the curve may pass through the center of this ring. The region beyond permits closed, time-like curves. Since the trajectory of observers and particles in general relativity are described by time-like curves, it is possible for observers in this region to return to their past.
While it is expected that the exterior region of the Kerr solution is stable, and that all rotating black holes will eventually approach a Kerr metric, the interior region of the solution appears to be unstable, much like a pencil balanced on its point (Penrose 1968).
could the two seperate islands be on different time planes- thus able TO CHANGE stuff…
If you’re looking to hear it, you probably will. I played it to some friends (lost fans) without telling them what to look for and they all said it just sounded like he was stuttering ‘no, what are you doing’?
That’s how you gotta do it. Once you have the words written in your head you hear what you want. I think if they were going to put that easter egg in they would have made the name a lot more clear
“I think if they were going to put that easter egg in they would have made the name a lot more clear”
I think the exact opposite. LOST loves being intentionally vague.
I can’t say for certain if he’s saying LaFleur or not. But it did sound like there was another voice in addition to Daniel’s which could have been Sawyer (aka LaFleur).
Is it just me or in the first non-Chang dialogue in the video – there are 2 distinct voices
Voice 1 = None of that matters.
then
Voice 2 = It doesn’t matter. Just get to it. Please!
Voice 1 sounds like Miles
Voice 2 sounds like Daniel
Go to this web page,
http://lostpedia.wikia.com/wiki/Pierre_Chang
and then after reading it, you should not have any doubts about what he said “La Fleur”. First of all, because it’s in the transcripts of the video at this web site. Second of all, if you realize that the date this “aired” was July 26, 2008, you will know the Lost writers were already in the thick of what would be happening this season on the show and so it’s not a stretch that he would’ve said “Le Fleur”.In fact, it’s quite deliberate like the rest of the video. This web page has an abundance of info about this character and all the Dharma tapes that aired on the show, as well as ones that were not on the show such as this one.
Haha, if wiki says so, it must be, lol.
Lol yeah Dru, I might edit that wiki article so Chang now says ” Vincent! No! What are you doing!”
LOL! You just made me pee a little. Not enought to go and change my pants though…
too funny
And the change to the transcript was just changed today. What a coincidence…
From This: DR. CHANG: No! What are you doing? [static] – Revision as of 04:07, 8 March 2009
To This: DR. CHANG: No! LaFleur, what are you doing? [static] – Current revision (18:34, 9 March 2009)
That’s why you cannot ever trust Wiki. Any joe schmoe can make changes.
“Trust no one.” Oh, err, sorry…that’s from a different show.
I was just about to go research that and then I read your comment. Thanks for saving me some time.
As near as I can tell, people have always believed what they wanted to believe or heard what they wanted to hear. Just because someone posts it, doesn’t mean it’s true. Doesn’t mean it’s false either. And I suspect (rather strongly) that if people really have all the answers to LOST that even the writers and producers might not even have, they wouldn’t be bothered to post here and debate these things.
In the opening to S5 where Cheng is being filmed the camera man is a dead ring for Sawyer. This was commented on by everyone. So, a suggestion of Sawyer player the camera man part was there from the beginning of S5. Great catch. I’m a be liev er.
Sorry, man. No way. I just rewatched it.
yeah it’s not.
Everyone. Really…?
Hey. If you listen at 1:53, just after cheng said “regardless”, there was another small voice that said “Is this (‘movie’ or something) is on?” That small voice does sound like Sawyer..
I didn’t hear any voice that sounded like Sawyer. I think it’s entirely possible that in the original planning stages for season five that it was Faraday they had planned on being called LaFleur.
Well, the first episode of Totally LOST by Jeff Jensen had a Jeremy Davies interview.
http://www.ew.com/ew/package/0,,1550612_20245764,00.html?bcpid=4396297001&bclid=9302206001&bctid=13970587001
It’s the one released on January 28th. Around 3:15 in..
Notice he claimed that what we saw at Comic Con was only half of what we are going to see. So, given what we saw in last week’s episode, I’m tempted to believe Chang is saying ‘LaFleur’. Even though I can only hear ‘what are you doing la….’
Listen to it with a pair of headphones on. He says “LaFleur, what are you doing?”
I agree…I just listened with headphones on in my quiet office and it does say “La Fleur”…..Or at least that is what I am going with…the last thing that is said before the film cuts off, before the man says “Is that a camera?”
Oh wow. This is still going on, huh? -Sigh-, we are a pathetic fan base; loyal and the most intelligent, but (and I know some of you can agree after reading 60 plus comments about someone saying or not saying ‘LaFluer’) pathetic. I include myself in this category so dont fret; no need to send the hate my way.
After my deliberation I’ve come to the conclusion that Chang says, ‘LOST fans need to just enjoy the ride and stop trying to predict every little thing that happens on the show. Now, somebody get me a coffee mocha with two sugars before I punched a hole in that rock and destroy the world.’ How did you all miss that?
: ) Love ya, LOSTIES!!!
(For those of you who love art, check out my work at http://hatterandharestudios.deviantart.com/ , theres a lot of LOST art in my portfolio as well)
amazing george carlin, man! i want to buy “Benjamin Linus Sees Alex Die”…
Sure man, the prints are only 40 dollars…
hatterandharestudios@yahoo.com
I agree about sitting back and just enjoying the ride of LOST.
I think what hit such a nerve with me about the original post, is that I know I’ve seen the video before, but can’t place what web site or where else that might have been? I certainly hadn’t seen it through attending anything Comic Con related, because I had never even heard of that before. Whether or not Chang says “Le Fleur” isn’t as big of a mystery to me as when and where did I see this before. I distinctly remember having seen before the first part of the video with the kid crying.
Does anyone else know they have seen this before, and specifically where it was????
It was plastered on just about every fan site just after Comicon. I’ve only ever frequented this site and Lostpedia, so my bet is that you’d have seen it in either place…
Amazing! The one of the child’s fingers gripping the thumb is brilliant.
I don’t know if your aware, but darkufo posted your art on his website http://lostfanfic.blogspot.com/2009/03/benjamin-linus-sees-alex-die-by-jason.html and it appears he hasn’t given you credit…. (or am I not seeing it?)
I odn’t hear La Fleur at the end at all. It would have been a nice twist, but until its somehow made official I’ll wait to reserve judgement.
For my two cents… definitely LaFleur. Also my first time seeing that! HAHAH, and I call myself a Lost fan!
Tsk tsk…
“LaFleur what are you doing?” comes in at 2:44 on the meter clock with the video. It is definitely there and would lead me to believe that Sawyer is in the room while Faraday is talking to Chang. Maybe he is the camera man or maybe he is there in his role as Head of Security for Dharma on the island.
Wow! I actually just read all of that!
The truly sad part is that IT DOESN’T MATTER if Chang says “LaFleur” or not!
We KNOW Daniel is there, so LaFleur might as well be there too–it’s a moot point.
The only reason people are obsessing about this issue is because Lost fans REALLY really want to believe that the producers have a master plan…or that some ‘higher power’ is pulling the strings. So we look for proof that “they knew what they were doing in past episodes/seasons” even though we may be giving them too much credit.
The REAL question is: Who was this video intended for—Desmond or the 316ers?
So wait…you mean to tell me you REALLY don’t believe THAT THEY DON’T have a master plan? After everything we’ve seen. After all THE connections and “coincidences”, you still think that, eh?
And for your “REAL” question…the video probably wasn’t intended FOR either. The video was INTENDED TO REACH those who are behind the Dharma Initiative. Chang is trying TO GET THEM to reconstitute it.
Haha yeah, I “REALLY don’t believe THAT THEY DON’T have a master plan.”
Errr, yes. I don’t believe they don’t have a plan. These double-negatives are confusing…..
They do have a master plan, however, the real issue is that Lost fans are so obsessed with being the first one to discover an Easter Egg and being right. In this case it is a moot point. Why bother putting the name “LaFleur” in the video when at the time it had no relevance? The name LaFleur did not become relevant until the episode titled “LaFleur”. If we had seen “LaFleur” before we saw the comicon video, different story. Think about it. What is the big reveal here? OMG! We just saw Sawyer become LaFleur! We were all wondering who LaFleur was since Comicon 08! ’cause we all heard the name LaFleur last spring and all wondered about it! Don’t you remember all of the internet chatter about the name LaFleur since last summer! Finally! Some frakking closure! Remember when I said ” did he just say LaFleur? I knew it meant something! Unnghh!*fist pump*I frakking rock!
Seriously?
Laura/Lara
=certainty
http://lostpedia.wikia.com/wiki/The_Lostpedia_Interview:Fran%C3%A7ois_Chau
source