Comments on: Lost spoilers season 6

By: 4,8,15,16,32,42...EQUASTION corrected

4,8,15,16,32,42...EQUASTION corrected — Tue, 22 Dec 2009 11:38:38 +0000

i agree with frodo’z unquestionable logic… lets continue listening, in the hope that we may learn enough 2 parrot hiz brilliance

By: FRODO_ROCKERFELLA

FRODO_ROCKERFELLA — Tue, 22 Dec 2009 10:25:05 +0000

i think the time line will change… but in a way where(sum or all 815rz) will keep (sum or all) of there memoriez/experience… b4 da nerdz say that makes no sense onda spacetimecontinubooble, consider this iz lost and the island iz a harsh mistress… u dont get 2 trash the island and just leave without a care, i cant explain the state of da island (iz it intact when 815 touchez down in LAX?) or the islandz intentionz 2ward da 815rz… will it only bring back the important onez?? anywayz i thought of this when i heard that kate will b in a taxi with claire at lax, claire will play a guide reveling she rememberz da island and that her dad (christian) haz told her wat the 815rz r 2 do.. and kate and/or claire will have 2 lead the unpredictable and challenging task of getting our ppl back and her scepticism will b gone and her jack and wheely locke will be faithrz asking ppl at the airport if they want join theyre knew religion…. joking at da end….. our locke aint going back in a chair… LOL happy holidayz

By: Supernatural Season

Supernatural Season — Sun, 20 Sep 2009 18:12:49 +0000

I like to watch Supernatural and also Lost, becous the sexy cast lol. BTW found this site on google, searched for some TV Show Plot.

By: Michelle

Michelle — Thu, 06 Aug 2009 05:23:33 +0000

Here is a wild idea, change the timeline, but show that just because the timeline changed, or perhaps in spite of it, NOTHING actually changed. They call it Fate.

By: ZooBot23

ZooBot23 — Fri, 19 Jun 2009 19:24:58 +0000

While I lean on the side of no (big) time-line change, if only because there’s not much time to resolve a new mess of giant proportions…I still think it’s possible in the sense that it would “save” Jacob and the LOST writers have no doubt worked things out to a very intricate degree and I trust that they could do that in a satisfying (and unpredictable) way.
My guess is that they may start the season much like season 1 (or just have a main character interacting with a dead one like Charlie), but use the old dream trick.
It’s their last chance to do another epic “where are we?” season intro.

By: JimmyFord

JimmyFord — Fri, 12 Jun 2009 20:13:33 +0000

A new timeline comes to mind quickly to explain away everything that’s happened and any paradoxes that may be prevalent, but you’re missing the obvious…what’s done is done!

By: Ambivalentman

Ambivalentman — Tue, 09 Jun 2009 14:13:15 +0000

Been thinking a lot about it, and I don’t think the timeline will be altered. After all, dead is dead on LOST, and too many of our survivors died over the course of the last five seasons. Bringing them all back to the show would be very difficult and not very likely. That’s on a practical, filmmaking level.

On a more fictional level, using an alternate timeline would nullify the rules of the show, be a cheat to the audience (on par of the “it’s-all-a-dream” ending), and sully all of the emotional investment we’ve had in these characters since episode one.

I’m not quite sure yet where things will be going next season — my speculation is that the bomb somehow rattled the donkey wheel out of place again and whisked our castaways to another time before they could be incinerated at ground zero. This may put them in another save the Island scenario. After all, if the Island is indeed a living entity, as many of us believe, why would it allow anyone to kill it without self-defense? When the first hydrogen bomb was tested on Bikini Atoll, it wiped the island off the map. The same would no doubt happen here.

My theory, though, is riddled in paradoxes. I just don’t believe the timeline can be changed based on the rules the writers have worked so hard to institute in this series.

By: Kiekow

Kiekow — Tue, 09 Jun 2009 13:33:37 +0000

yes, he saw Christian. He said to someone “she left with someone she called dad”. Not positive about exactly what Miles said but sure he did see Christian.

By: Ament

Ament — Tue, 09 Jun 2009 07:37:54 +0000

He did say he wanted to convince him to not work for Widmore, but he also said Miles was “playing for the wrong team” which could mean anything in the grand scheme.

By: Ament

Ament — Tue, 09 Jun 2009 07:20:13 +0000

True, but he only needs to be near the bodies to speak with them

By: adam118

adam118 — Tue, 09 Jun 2009 06:44:11 +0000

No new timeline.

By: adam118

adam118 — Tue, 09 Jun 2009 06:43:26 +0000

Yes. Bram said he was on the wrong side because he was working for Widmore.

If I remember right, he can only read recently dead bodies.

By: joetuppy

joetuppy — Tue, 09 Jun 2009 06:20:09 +0000

Miles wasn’t there yet for Nikki and Paulo…

By: Ament

Ament — Tue, 09 Jun 2009 03:00:25 +0000

All we know is that Claire was sitting by a lovely campfire with Sawyer and Miles then Christian came for a visit to hold the baby in the middle of the night where her responce was “Dad!?”. She acknowledged Christian as dad for the first time then…Aaron was left a few feet from the camp. The next morning Miles was wide awake he said to Sawyer she walked off in the jungle and with an attitude reminded Sawyer’s threat in coming to close to her, if we remember miles gave her a weird look that sparked Sawyer all it takes is a look in the show to go back and say “wow, he knew”. I’m guessing a flash will show us the conversation the two had that night and Miles listening in…Miles has the opportunity for the show to answer our questions such as talking to Locke’s body, letting people know Nikki and Paulo were not dead, Adam and Eve, the DI pile-on of the dead. But what side is he on….why would Bram tell him he’s on the wrong side when we know Bram and Illana are pro-Jacob, was it becasue of Widmore or something else?

By: mpl

mpl — Mon, 08 Jun 2009 22:33:28 +0000

Ya know, you’re right – snip away!