Comments on: Interview with Reiko Aylesworth spoilers episode 5×08

By: Influence

Influence — Wed, 04 May 2011 17:29:11 +0000

Trackback Post On Anxin’s Blog…

…An older post that I hadn’t seen before but which…

By: Milo Piluso

Milo Piluso — Fri, 09 Apr 2010 05:52:02 +0000

This is my Excerpt

By: Ronnie Dimiceli

Ronnie Dimiceli — Fri, 09 Apr 2010 05:32:34 +0000

OK cool to see- informed blogs are always helpful! See yas.

By: My Domain

My Domain — Fri, 05 Feb 2010 01:15:48 +0000

Joe…

Check out my domain sometime….

By: ray

ray — Fri, 06 Mar 2009 18:52:10 +0000

Marc, don’t worry about the a-hole comment, I’ve been called worse. SHOCKING. I just disagree with you. The example you gave of Lance Reddick, I actually would agree with you as being a spoiler. My point was that if NEW characters are mentioned, and their roles (in the story, or their names) are unrevealed, that really nothing is spoiled. And again, while I get your point about Abaddon being in the show being a spoiler, we still don’t know what will happen to him. It wasn’t like it said, “Lance Reddick appears as Abaddon, and is shot and killed in a cemetary.” So, I get your point, but I still respectfully disagree with you, and believe that not all casting notices are spoilers.

By: marc

marc — Fri, 06 Mar 2009 16:01:05 +0000

sorry for the asshole comment ray. i just felt like you were attacking/belittling me and i didnt appreciate it. and thanks for the support eh. although i do agree ray that it is very minor it is still info about an unseen episode nonetheless. for instance i didnt know lance reddick would appear on lost in season four and it was a great surprise. i prefer to not know anything at all. but i also like coming to the sight, reading reviews, interviews etc, i just think the headlines of the spoilers should be as vague as possible. that way its the viewers choice to read it or not. i dont want to have to not come to the website. I dont see how u can have a problem with this..

By: Eh

Eh — Thu, 05 Mar 2009 21:47:27 +0000

Wow. I absolutely do not want to get in the middle of this silly fight, but I did want to side with Marc. While I agree that giving a character’s name would not spoil much, giving the actor’s name can be a spoiler in this instance because she is not “an unknown actress.” We know Reiko from 24. We know that she has curly hair. We know she is of mixed Asian decent. We may not have known that she was pregnant when this was posted, but in this show when everyone is connected we can imagine who she is related to just by knowing her looks. Now we know she is having a baby boy and we’re all searching our brains for any known character that could have looked like he could be her son.

This is just an example to prove that Marc has a valid point.

By: AL

AL — Thu, 05 Mar 2009 10:56:06 +0000

the other number one dint die ……..the one who bagged amy..!!!!!!! EX?? NOT SURE….PRICIPAL JOHN SKINNER flashback babey……..

By: Ray

Ray — Thu, 05 Mar 2009 02:38:31 +0000

OK, so they say that there’s a new character. There’s no explanation of what she’s all about or what role she’ll play in the plot. I don’t see how such a small tidbit of information is ruining your viewing pleasure. The example you gave that I was critical of used known qualities- characters that were coming on the show that had not been seen in a while. In that case, yes, I agree, that would be a spoiler, however, giving an unknown name of an unknown character who will be performing an unknown role is NOT a spoiler. This does not ruin our surprise for the show. Would you say that knowing that this actress was on the show beforehand ruined your enjoyment of the show? A spoiler, by definition SPOILS something. Was “Lafleur” spoiled knowing that this woman was on it?

You are not “Forced” to read anything. YOU typed in the web address despite your objection to the material. YOU came here enough to rebut the criticism. No one forced you to subject yourself to knowing the name of and unknown actress playing an unknown role.

And, if I want to be called an asshole, I’ll talk to my wife.

By: Ray

Ray — Thu, 05 Mar 2009 00:12:15 +0000

Marc,

I wrote “…how a new character’s a “spoiler” because I was abbreviating, ‘character IS a spoiler’. I was using an apostrophe to replace a letter(s), which is grammatically correct. Here’s another example…your comment’s asinine. See, there I used the apostrophe to replace the “i” in is.

I think the reason you’re getting so much reaction is that you say “may not fit under the exact definition of a spoiler”, thereby contradicting your main complaint. Then, letter, you give an example of what was NOT done. Your example cited exact actor/character names, which the article did not do.

I don’t (apostrophe replacing an “o”)think people mind criticism, it’s when it is ridiculous and contradictory that it’s a problem.

By: BAK2530

BAK2530 — Wed, 04 Mar 2009 23:47:02 +0000

I think its Ethan

By: marc

marc — Wed, 04 Mar 2009 21:53:53 +0000

its like im not allowed to voice a complaint without being attacked by minions. I know i have the option of not coming to the site itself, but im sure thats the last the thing the site’s runner wants. I like reading reviews and articles without being forced into reading descriptions about future unviewed events on the show itself (which includes a new character). I do not understand why you are all struggling so hard with this concept.

By: marc

marc — Wed, 04 Mar 2009 21:49:27 +0000

ohhhh dolce your so smart. I wish I had that type of wit. How did you every come up with such a clever joke? That must have taken you hours. You clearly have missed the entire point and if you can’t see that point that you have kind of weird arrogant agenda to be the ultimate and final word in what can be considered information about a future episode. I personally like to be introduced to characters and plots by the story itself, not by reading about it before hand.

By: marc

marc — Wed, 04 Mar 2009 21:27:14 +0000

Ray i typed that quickly but since we are being so picky. character’s a “spoiler”. That is so gramatically wrong i dont know where to start. character is a spoiler. There is nothing wrong with descriptive description.

doc it may not fit under the exact definition of a spoiler. but i didnt know there was a new character. I only watch the preview after the ep. This is a piece of info about an upcoming ep that i had no clue about. Is it that dificult for her to write on the main page Lost Casting Spoiler. Instead of that whole description. It would be like writing on the main page reddick or malcom david kelley wil be int his next episode. Would you consider that a spoiler as it ruins a suprise? I dont want to know anythign going into an episode. There are alot of people like me. Please oblige.

By: dolce

dolce — Wed, 04 Mar 2009 21:26:48 +0000

I heard there was a character named Jack in season 6, episode 17.

By: docarzt

docarzt — Wed, 04 Mar 2009 19:23:24 +0000

This is not a spoiler. Spoilers reveal story information.

By: Ray

Ray — Wed, 04 Mar 2009 18:56:29 +0000

marc, not sure how telling us about a new character’s a “spoiler”.

“Descriptive description”?

site, not “sight”

By: marc

marc — Wed, 04 Mar 2009 17:31:57 +0000

Hey Lyly your biggest fan marc again. I didn’t ready anythign past what it said on the main page. BUT PLEASE DONT WRITE SUCH A DESCRIPTIVE DESCRIPTION ON THE MAIN PAGE. Everyone else can be vague but you. You are the worst. That is a spoiler. Learning there is a new character named amy is a spoiler. Just write in the description. Casting spoiler for episode eight. Don’t reveal so much. Damn. I love this sight but im going to have to stop coming here.

By: jackisjacob

jackisjacob — Wed, 04 Mar 2009 17:00:38 +0000

i would say so. lets get a list going on people the baby could be. since its 70s i am gonna say either charlotte. cant think of many other people it would be

By: professorstotch

professorstotch — Wed, 04 Mar 2009 15:16:21 +0000

Since this is a spoiler article, I gues spoilers in the comments are game too. Anyone else think that Sawyer is going to be the daddy of pregnant Amy?