<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Lost Supper</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-spoilers/a-lost-supper/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-spoilers/a-lost-supper/</link>
	<description>Everything Lost found here.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 02:11:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: a long distance relationship</title>
		<link>http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-spoilers/a-lost-supper/comment-page-1/#comment-1222880</link>
		<dc:creator>a long distance relationship</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 19:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-spoilers/a-lost-supper/#comment-1222880</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;a long distance relationship...&lt;/strong&gt;

A Lost Supper DocArzt&#039;s LOST Blog...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>a long distance relationship&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>A Lost Supper DocArzt&#039;s LOST Blog&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amatora Lustrzanka</title>
		<link>http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-spoilers/a-lost-supper/comment-page-1/#comment-272992</link>
		<dc:creator>Amatora Lustrzanka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 00:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-spoilers/a-lost-supper/#comment-272992</guid>
		<description>I will immediately grab your rss feed as I can&#039;t find your email subscription link or newsletter service. Do you&#039;ve any? Please let me know in order that I could subscribe. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will immediately grab your rss feed as I can&#8217;t find your email subscription link or newsletter service. Do you&#8217;ve any? Please let me know in order that I could subscribe. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robbyn Kinlecheeny</title>
		<link>http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-spoilers/a-lost-supper/comment-page-1/#comment-107208</link>
		<dc:creator>Robbyn Kinlecheeny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 12:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-spoilers/a-lost-supper/#comment-107208</guid>
		<description>Remember, there are almost 300 million hens out there each producing about an egg a day. Billions of eggs are eaten around the world daily, and many people depend on them for their daily nutrition. Eggs contain the most digestible protein available in nature. I wouldn’t recommend eating raw eggs, raw pork, or drink un-pastuerized milk. In fact no one since Rocky Balboa has actually eaten a raw egg on purpose. Isn’t there even a warning on the carton and every menu in the country? You shouldn’t drink downstream from the herd, play in the street, or eat unwashed greens. Proper food preparation is everyone’s responsibility. It will be a shame if eggs disappear from anyone’s diet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember, there are almost 300 million hens out there each producing about an egg a day. Billions of eggs are eaten around the world daily, and many people depend on them for their daily nutrition. Eggs contain the most digestible protein available in nature. I wouldn’t recommend eating raw eggs, raw pork, or drink un-pastuerized milk. In fact no one since Rocky Balboa has actually eaten a raw egg on purpose. Isn’t there even a warning on the carton and every menu in the country? You shouldn’t drink downstream from the herd, play in the street, or eat unwashed greens. Proper food preparation is everyone’s responsibility. It will be a shame if eggs disappear from anyone’s diet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Augustus Liss</title>
		<link>http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-spoilers/a-lost-supper/comment-page-1/#comment-70339</link>
		<dc:creator>Augustus Liss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 18:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-spoilers/a-lost-supper/#comment-70339</guid>
		<description>Hey, i came across your website on yahoo and i think it&#039;s great!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, i came across your website on yahoo and i think it&#8217;s great!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pop Culture Zoo - Building Better Geeks! &#124; Lost Luggage: &#8216;The Package&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-spoilers/a-lost-supper/comment-page-1/#comment-67791</link>
		<dc:creator>Pop Culture Zoo - Building Better Geeks! &#124; Lost Luggage: &#8216;The Package&#8217;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 21:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-spoilers/a-lost-supper/#comment-67791</guid>
		<description>[...] “The Lost Supper” promo image that was revealed before the season, Sawyer was believed to be in St. Peter’s spot, and Zoe’s first appearance did take place in Sawyer’s episode ‘Recon.’ Could it be a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] “The Lost Supper” promo image that was revealed before the season, Sawyer was believed to be in St. Peter’s spot, and Zoe’s first appearance did take place in Sawyer’s episode ‘Recon.’ Could it be a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trampledtim</title>
		<link>http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-spoilers/a-lost-supper/comment-page-1/#comment-64069</link>
		<dc:creator>trampledtim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-spoilers/a-lost-supper/#comment-64069</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been thinking the same way about Jacob and MIB.  One of those articles in Entertainment weekly contained a comment by producers that the &quot;good/evil&quot; view of the two men isn&#039;t exactly right.  Everything has an opposing force that keeps things in balance.  Angels/Demons, Dark/Light, War/Peace...Each not existing without the other.
I think of the two as creation/destruction, each one being a form of the other.  The conversation in the beginning of &quot;The Incident&quot; shows on side fearing change and growth and the other wanting to enourage it.  It reminded me of the Garden of Eden story where God tells Adam and Eve not to eat from the tree of knowledge.  Eventually, an opposing force, the serpent, tempts them to eat and they are cast out.  Metaphorically, this story is the beginning of human creation, which, in order to grow, has to destroy what is already there - creation is put in to overdrive rather than kept in the control of God and his little garden.
I guess my point is this - when you put Jacob and MIB into this story about the nature of our place in the world.  Jacob is closer to being the serpent, the opposing force.  Therefore, good and evil my not be the way to think of it.
Sidenote/early prediction - The end of the world as we know it will happen, and two people will be left to start the game again.  Everyone else will die.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been thinking the same way about Jacob and MIB.  One of those articles in Entertainment weekly contained a comment by producers that the &#8220;good/evil&#8221; view of the two men isn&#8217;t exactly right.  Everything has an opposing force that keeps things in balance.  Angels/Demons, Dark/Light, War/Peace&#8230;Each not existing without the other.<br />
I think of the two as creation/destruction, each one being a form of the other.  The conversation in the beginning of &#8220;The Incident&#8221; shows on side fearing change and growth and the other wanting to enourage it.  It reminded me of the Garden of Eden story where God tells Adam and Eve not to eat from the tree of knowledge.  Eventually, an opposing force, the serpent, tempts them to eat and they are cast out.  Metaphorically, this story is the beginning of human creation, which, in order to grow, has to destroy what is already there &#8211; creation is put in to overdrive rather than kept in the control of God and his little garden.<br />
I guess my point is this &#8211; when you put Jacob and MIB into this story about the nature of our place in the world.  Jacob is closer to being the serpent, the opposing force.  Therefore, good and evil my not be the way to think of it.<br />
Sidenote/early prediction &#8211; The end of the world as we know it will happen, and two people will be left to start the game again.  Everyone else will die.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GLORIA</title>
		<link>http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-spoilers/a-lost-supper/comment-page-1/#comment-54895</link>
		<dc:creator>GLORIA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 14:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-spoilers/a-lost-supper/#comment-54895</guid>
		<description>Hmmmm..Will have to dig into this when I have a moment and see. I believe that the whole cast is representative of a Microcosm...A smaller version of the whole...Each Character representing a certain persona present in our day to day life, and in a much larger context, of course, globally. Charlie&#039;s Song We are Everybody is the whole basis for the show. Despite the despicable things many of the character&#039;s have been responsible for, even Jack, you find it in your heart to tolerate each, even to see their point of view. This is an important aspect of the show. Locke always has something telling to say of course. In the end, I think Hurley wil have a much bigger role thant they have let on. He&#039;s the unassumimg background man...We shall see...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmmm..Will have to dig into this when I have a moment and see. I believe that the whole cast is representative of a Microcosm&#8230;A smaller version of the whole&#8230;Each Character representing a certain persona present in our day to day life, and in a much larger context, of course, globally. Charlie&#8217;s Song We are Everybody is the whole basis for the show. Despite the despicable things many of the character&#8217;s have been responsible for, even Jack, you find it in your heart to tolerate each, even to see their point of view. This is an important aspect of the show. Locke always has something telling to say of course. In the end, I think Hurley wil have a much bigger role thant they have let on. He&#8217;s the unassumimg background man&#8230;We shall see&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isiah Greenspan</title>
		<link>http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-spoilers/a-lost-supper/comment-page-1/#comment-54357</link>
		<dc:creator>Isiah Greenspan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 00:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-spoilers/a-lost-supper/#comment-54357</guid>
		<description>Nice stuff writen here, i will be visiting this site once again...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice stuff writen here, i will be visiting this site once again&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeza</title>
		<link>http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-spoilers/a-lost-supper/comment-page-1/#comment-53608</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 05:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-spoilers/a-lost-supper/#comment-53608</guid>
		<description>Yo! What is that thing above Lapidus&#039;s Head? it looks like some kinda freaky stretchy arm!! XD JACOOOOOOOOOOOOOOB! lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yo! What is that thing above Lapidus&#8217;s Head? it looks like some kinda freaky stretchy arm!! XD JACOOOOOOOOOOOOOOB! lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bezmina</title>
		<link>http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-spoilers/a-lost-supper/comment-page-1/#comment-51575</link>
		<dc:creator>Bezmina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 12:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-spoilers/a-lost-supper/#comment-51575</guid>
		<description>Oh Fishbiscuit how I missed you! Thanks for this little tidbit!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh Fishbiscuit how I missed you! Thanks for this little tidbit!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Counting down until the LOST Season 6 Premiere (Feb 2, 2010) &#171; A Revolution of the Mind</title>
		<link>http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-spoilers/a-lost-supper/comment-page-1/#comment-51136</link>
		<dc:creator>Counting down until the LOST Season 6 Premiere (Feb 2, 2010) &#171; A Revolution of the Mind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 19:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-spoilers/a-lost-supper/#comment-51136</guid>
		<description>[...] Is John Locke in the Jesus position to show that he is a prophet or martyr? You can read DocArtz fascinating breakdown or EW’s Doc Jensens’ extensive [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Is John Locke in the Jesus position to show that he is a prophet or martyr? You can read DocArtz fascinating breakdown or EW’s Doc Jensens’ extensive [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MissInfo.tv &#187; Counting down until the LOST Season 6 Premiere (Feb 2)</title>
		<link>http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-spoilers/a-lost-supper/comment-page-1/#comment-51102</link>
		<dc:creator>MissInfo.tv &#187; Counting down until the LOST Season 6 Premiere (Feb 2)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 08:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-spoilers/a-lost-supper/#comment-51102</guid>
		<description>[...] Is John Locke in the Jesus position to show that he is a prophet or martyr? You can read DocArtz fascinating breakdown or EW&#8217;s Doc Jensens&#8217; extensive [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Is John Locke in the Jesus position to show that he is a prophet or martyr? You can read DocArtz fascinating breakdown or EW&#8217;s Doc Jensens&#8217; extensive [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Absz009</title>
		<link>http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-spoilers/a-lost-supper/comment-page-1/#comment-50915</link>
		<dc:creator>Absz009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 04:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-spoilers/a-lost-supper/#comment-50915</guid>
		<description>I agree 100%. Well said, Shane. Exactly my thoughts ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree 100%. Well said, Shane. Exactly my thoughts <img src='http://www.docarzt.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seabiscuit</title>
		<link>http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-spoilers/a-lost-supper/comment-page-1/#comment-50911</link>
		<dc:creator>Seabiscuit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 02:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-spoilers/a-lost-supper/#comment-50911</guid>
		<description>For something that&#039;s of &quot;no consequence&quot; as you imply, Darlton sure seem to love spending a lot of time on it. Just a thought.

But I agree that this whole Skate vs Jate thing has gotten to ridiculous proportions. Time to let it go, folks. It&#039;s one thing to root for your couple, entirely another to go out of your way to attack others just because they don&#039;t ship the same couple. (and I am speaking in general here, not singling any one person or any group out)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For something that&#8217;s of &#8220;no consequence&#8221; as you imply, Darlton sure seem to love spending a lot of time on it. Just a thought.</p>
<p>But I agree that this whole Skate vs Jate thing has gotten to ridiculous proportions. Time to let it go, folks. It&#8217;s one thing to root for your couple, entirely another to go out of your way to attack others just because they don&#8217;t ship the same couple. (and I am speaking in general here, not singling any one person or any group out)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Absz009</title>
		<link>http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-spoilers/a-lost-supper/comment-page-1/#comment-50837</link>
		<dc:creator>Absz009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 04:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-spoilers/a-lost-supper/#comment-50837</guid>
		<description>Nope, I&#039;m telling you it&#039;s Aaron XD. He&#039;s been transformed into a lumbering kid giant by Jacob. He&#039;s LOST&#039;s version of the BFG hehe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope, I&#8217;m telling you it&#8217;s Aaron XD. He&#8217;s been transformed into a lumbering kid giant by Jacob. He&#8217;s LOST&#8217;s version of the BFG hehe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane</title>
		<link>http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-spoilers/a-lost-supper/comment-page-1/#comment-50836</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 04:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-spoilers/a-lost-supper/#comment-50836</guid>
		<description>oops i meant below, there are too many comments flying fast and furious, but yours are some of the few on here with regard to this particular subject that make sense.
Below was my response to something you posted. Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oops i meant below, there are too many comments flying fast and furious, but yours are some of the few on here with regard to this particular subject that make sense.<br />
Below was my response to something you posted. Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane</title>
		<link>http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-spoilers/a-lost-supper/comment-page-1/#comment-50835</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 04:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-spoilers/a-lost-supper/#comment-50835</guid>
		<description>Thank you Monique (&amp; see my comment above) for reality based thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Monique (&amp; see my comment above) for reality based thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane</title>
		<link>http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-spoilers/a-lost-supper/comment-page-1/#comment-50834</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 04:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-spoilers/a-lost-supper/#comment-50834</guid>
		<description>First of all, let&#039;s recap. 
Josh @ Comic-Con: Sawyer will be destroyed and he hopes Kate will bring him back to life
Josh @ TV Guide: Sawyer IS destroyed, making it impossible for him to be with Kate right now. (We assume that Sawyer is the character who will attempt to kill himself, the character that Jack saves).
More important than either of these statements are the statements of Darlton who have already said that while some things remained the same all through the show&#039;s life, some changes have been made based on the character&#039;s growth and the way the actors worked together, their chemistry.
If that is not your answer, I don&#039;t know what is.
Jack is not good enough to lace Kate&#039;s boots, and the chemistry with he and Kate is almost as paint-dryingling-horrid as the chemistry between rebound-cliche-blonde Juliet and James. There is only one outcome and it is the relationship that the two writers and two actors have spent 5 years crafting - intense,complex, passionate, difficult and fiery and the one that has all the power of redemption - and that is the union of Kate and Sawyer.
There is no other way for it to end, not without the characters selling out and settling for realities that are not even good fictional cliches. (Not to mention I cannot for the life of me imagine Matthew Fox going along with ANYthing so cliche as the hero gets the girl, he is SO NOT that man, or that actor).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, let&#8217;s recap.<br />
Josh @ Comic-Con: Sawyer will be destroyed and he hopes Kate will bring him back to life<br />
Josh @ TV Guide: Sawyer IS destroyed, making it impossible for him to be with Kate right now. (We assume that Sawyer is the character who will attempt to kill himself, the character that Jack saves).<br />
More important than either of these statements are the statements of Darlton who have already said that while some things remained the same all through the show&#8217;s life, some changes have been made based on the character&#8217;s growth and the way the actors worked together, their chemistry.<br />
If that is not your answer, I don&#8217;t know what is.<br />
Jack is not good enough to lace Kate&#8217;s boots, and the chemistry with he and Kate is almost as paint-dryingling-horrid as the chemistry between rebound-cliche-blonde Juliet and James. There is only one outcome and it is the relationship that the two writers and two actors have spent 5 years crafting &#8211; intense,complex, passionate, difficult and fiery and the one that has all the power of redemption &#8211; and that is the union of Kate and Sawyer.<br />
There is no other way for it to end, not without the characters selling out and settling for realities that are not even good fictional cliches. (Not to mention I cannot for the life of me imagine Matthew Fox going along with ANYthing so cliche as the hero gets the girl, he is SO NOT that man, or that actor).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane</title>
		<link>http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-spoilers/a-lost-supper/comment-page-1/#comment-50833</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 04:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-spoilers/a-lost-supper/#comment-50833</guid>
		<description>I think it is pretty obviously the photographer or someone on the team, gesturing to them. Juliet! LOL!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it is pretty obviously the photographer or someone on the team, gesturing to them. Juliet! LOL!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane</title>
		<link>http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-spoilers/a-lost-supper/comment-page-1/#comment-50832</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 04:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-spoilers/a-lost-supper/#comment-50832</guid>
		<description>Des will be back, we already know he has a centric episode with show 11. But...if you remember the poster at the Lost underground art exhibit, there is no Penny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Des will be back, we already know he has a centric episode with show 11. But&#8230;if you remember the poster at the Lost underground art exhibit, there is no Penny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eren Zaki</title>
		<link>http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-spoilers/a-lost-supper/comment-page-1/#comment-50830</link>
		<dc:creator>Eren Zaki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 03:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-spoilers/a-lost-supper/#comment-50830</guid>
		<description>Oh, sorry I don&#039;t think I was clear. I&#039;m well aware Kate, Sawyer, Jack, Hurley and Sayid were all touched by Jacob. The reason I was singling out Kate and Sawyer was because they were touched by Jacob when they were CHILDREN hence my rant(in the second paragraph)about the children-orientated side of LOST&#039;s mythology. 

I was suggesting maybe the fact that Sawyer and Kate were touched by Jacob as children is somehow significant in some way to the story since the show has a lot of children-orientated subplots. And I was also saying maybe the fact that Sawyer and Kate were on the list was related to them being touched by Jacob as children. Because remember the Others were reguarly given lists by Alpert via Jacob to kidnap children and pregnant women from camps (such as Ana Lucia&#039;s tail wing section camp and Walt). I dunno I just think there maybe a connection there. A possible relevation somewhere in there involving Kate and Sawyer and that connection he felt to her.

But now you tell me Kate and Sawywer wern&#039;t on the list. I could swear Picket or Ben said in Season 3 that &quot;Ford and Austen are on the list&quot; or something and mentioned that Jack was not even on the list. Oh, well, you&#039;re probably right on this one because I&#039;ve only watched Season 3 once. I&#039;ll re-watch those episodes to make sure. Also, it makes sense I suppose, in the context of the story, of them not being on the list so that they could time travel to the 70s to set off the bomb. 

But anyways this is what I was trying to say. I wasn&#039;t trying to say Kate and Sawyer were the only ones who were touched by Jacob - but the fact that they were touched by Jacob as children. Hope I was clear this time.


Thanks for your response.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, sorry I don&#8217;t think I was clear. I&#8217;m well aware Kate, Sawyer, Jack, Hurley and Sayid were all touched by Jacob. The reason I was singling out Kate and Sawyer was because they were touched by Jacob when they were CHILDREN hence my rant(in the second paragraph)about the children-orientated side of LOST&#8217;s mythology. </p>
<p>I was suggesting maybe the fact that Sawyer and Kate were touched by Jacob as children is somehow significant in some way to the story since the show has a lot of children-orientated subplots. And I was also saying maybe the fact that Sawyer and Kate were on the list was related to them being touched by Jacob as children. Because remember the Others were reguarly given lists by Alpert via Jacob to kidnap children and pregnant women from camps (such as Ana Lucia&#8217;s tail wing section camp and Walt). I dunno I just think there maybe a connection there. A possible relevation somewhere in there involving Kate and Sawyer and that connection he felt to her.</p>
<p>But now you tell me Kate and Sawywer wern&#8217;t on the list. I could swear Picket or Ben said in Season 3 that &#8220;Ford and Austen are on the list&#8221; or something and mentioned that Jack was not even on the list. Oh, well, you&#8217;re probably right on this one because I&#8217;ve only watched Season 3 once. I&#8217;ll re-watch those episodes to make sure. Also, it makes sense I suppose, in the context of the story, of them not being on the list so that they could time travel to the 70s to set off the bomb. </p>
<p>But anyways this is what I was trying to say. I wasn&#8217;t trying to say Kate and Sawyer were the only ones who were touched by Jacob &#8211; but the fact that they were touched by Jacob as children. Hope I was clear this time.</p>
<p>Thanks for your response.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bulleteyes</title>
		<link>http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-spoilers/a-lost-supper/comment-page-1/#comment-50826</link>
		<dc:creator>bulleteyes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 02:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-spoilers/a-lost-supper/#comment-50826</guid>
		<description>The X Files also had their own version of a &quot;Last Supper&quot; photo that caused a great stir and endless speculation when it was published. It was from the last episode of the seventh season, &quot;Requiem&quot;.

http://www.denyeverything.org/x-files-requiem.jpg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The X Files also had their own version of a &#8220;Last Supper&#8221; photo that caused a great stir and endless speculation when it was published. It was from the last episode of the seventh season, &#8220;Requiem&#8221;.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.denyeverything.org/x-files-requiem.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.denyeverything.org/x-files-requiem.jpg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Analysis of the LOST Last Supper Promo — Uncharted Island</title>
		<link>http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-spoilers/a-lost-supper/comment-page-1/#comment-50824</link>
		<dc:creator>Analysis of the LOST Last Supper Promo — Uncharted Island</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 01:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-spoilers/a-lost-supper/#comment-50824</guid>
		<description>[...] is a phenomenal analysis of LOST&#8217;s new Last Supper promo done by Fishbiscuit over at DocArzt.com. With all of the religious overtones and allusions from the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is a phenomenal analysis of LOST&#8217;s new Last Supper promo done by Fishbiscuit over at DocArzt.com. With all of the religious overtones and allusions from the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mick</title>
		<link>http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-spoilers/a-lost-supper/comment-page-1/#comment-50823</link>
		<dc:creator>Mick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 01:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-spoilers/a-lost-supper/#comment-50823</guid>
		<description>Kate, Sawyer, Jack, Hurley and Sayid were all touched by Jacob.  Rewatch The Incident.  Kate and Sawyer were not on the list either.  None of them were, therefore they weren&#039;t taken by the others in season 1.  And, as we all know now, they weren;t on the list because they were meant to travel back in time and set off the bomb to get to where they are now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kate, Sawyer, Jack, Hurley and Sayid were all touched by Jacob.  Rewatch The Incident.  Kate and Sawyer were not on the list either.  None of them were, therefore they weren&#8217;t taken by the others in season 1.  And, as we all know now, they weren;t on the list because they were meant to travel back in time and set off the bomb to get to where they are now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Absz009</title>
		<link>http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-spoilers/a-lost-supper/comment-page-1/#comment-50820</link>
		<dc:creator>Absz009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 23:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-spoilers/a-lost-supper/#comment-50820</guid>
		<description>Hmmm that is a DAMN GOOD POINT. I tip my hat off to you, sir. I probably do have it backwards. And I guess that would make more sense Sawyer being on Jacob&#039;s side since, as he mentioned in the Season 5 finale to Jack, &quot;I don&#039;t do destiny&quot; or something like that, so it makes sense Sawyer would believe in free will not fate. And Jack has now become a man of faith and fate, like the real Locke, so he would side with Smokey/Evil Locke for the time being at least until he realises he&#039;s a fake Locke. Actually this makes more sense than my original post about the Smokey and Jacob factions on the Island.

But then what about Jacob&#039;s magical ability to guide/manipulate people&#039;s lives with a touch of his finger. Like a magic touch of destiny/fate. I&#039;m guessing the touch he gave to Sawyer and Kate as kid was to ensure that they both walked the path he wanted them to walk in life (criminality and revenge) - the path which would ensure them getting on Flight 815 in the future and thus their arrival on the Island. So it seems like Jacob has like a magic touch of fate/destiny where he is able to manipulate the course of one&#039;s life. My question is, why would a man of free will have an ability to manipulate one&#039;s destiny/fate if he doesn&#039;t believe in those idealogies/philosophies? 

Just trying look at it from all angles. Nevertheless, very good points, Gusteaux. I have to watch the Season 5 finale again cause I haven&#039;t watched it since it originally aired. 

Your theory of Jacob as the man of free will and Smokey/MiB as the man/monster of fate makes a lot of sense when analysing the mindset/beliefs certain characters have at this moment in time on thw show, that of course depends if my own theory of their being warring factions on the Island is correct in the first place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm that is a DAMN GOOD POINT. I tip my hat off to you, sir. I probably do have it backwards. And I guess that would make more sense Sawyer being on Jacob&#8217;s side since, as he mentioned in the Season 5 finale to Jack, &#8220;I don&#8217;t do destiny&#8221; or something like that, so it makes sense Sawyer would believe in free will not fate. And Jack has now become a man of faith and fate, like the real Locke, so he would side with Smokey/Evil Locke for the time being at least until he realises he&#8217;s a fake Locke. Actually this makes more sense than my original post about the Smokey and Jacob factions on the Island.</p>
<p>But then what about Jacob&#8217;s magical ability to guide/manipulate people&#8217;s lives with a touch of his finger. Like a magic touch of destiny/fate. I&#8217;m guessing the touch he gave to Sawyer and Kate as kid was to ensure that they both walked the path he wanted them to walk in life (criminality and revenge) &#8211; the path which would ensure them getting on Flight 815 in the future and thus their arrival on the Island. So it seems like Jacob has like a magic touch of fate/destiny where he is able to manipulate the course of one&#8217;s life. My question is, why would a man of free will have an ability to manipulate one&#8217;s destiny/fate if he doesn&#8217;t believe in those idealogies/philosophies? </p>
<p>Just trying look at it from all angles. Nevertheless, very good points, Gusteaux. I have to watch the Season 5 finale again cause I haven&#8217;t watched it since it originally aired. </p>
<p>Your theory of Jacob as the man of free will and Smokey/MiB as the man/monster of fate makes a lot of sense when analysing the mindset/beliefs certain characters have at this moment in time on thw show, that of course depends if my own theory of their being warring factions on the Island is correct in the first place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

