Popular Mechanics Weighs in on Daniel’s Bomb Disposal Techniques, and More ‘Jughead’ Fact-checking

3 Responses to “Popular Mechanics Weighs in on Daniel’s Bomb Disposal Techniques, and More ‘Jughead’ Fact-checking”

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. NOTE:Personal attacks of any kind will not be tolerated. Be nice, or be quiet. This includes name calling, aggresssive criticism, or any kind of attack against the site or a contributor. Spoilers are forbidden in the comments except to discuss the posted topic. Violating these rules could result in a ban. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

1. professorstotch says:

   January 29, 2009 at 11:06 am

   I like how they post a whole article on whether or not this bomb leaking is valid, and whether or not it can be buried. It’s a sci-fi show that is now dealing with people spontaneously traveling through time, and they’re worried about if burying this bomb matches up to scientific standards?

   Reply
2. Nicole says:

   January 30, 2009 at 1:09 pm

   I don’t think that the revelation of Charles Widmore funding Faraday is a huge surprise. I actually thought it was common knowledge because Faraday was on Widmore’s freighter…so he was working for him. : ]

   Reply
3. Max Kohen says:

   November 28, 2009 at 7:18 am

   Hi, I’ve accidently found this site whilst browsing on Google as I am searching for some info on engine lifts!. It’s a good blog so I’ve bookmarked your site and will return tomorrow to give it a more detailed read when I’m more free.

   Reply

This site utilizes the Global Avatar standard developed by Gravatar. To set your avatar, click on the logo to the left.