Comments on: Lost Eastereggs – Which Foot is it?

By: ipad car mount

ipad car mount — Thu, 06 Oct 2011 01:22:32 +0000

This can be my 2nd take a look at on your webpage! I genuinely benefit from your posting and I are convinced I am going to turn into a regular visitor on your blog! I take pleasure in your in depth posts about this subject matter and I benefit from the actuality that you are so experienced about this issue. Many thanks for the time!

By: cartuse imprimanta

cartuse imprimanta — Wed, 10 Aug 2011 21:44:44 +0000

http://www.bodyjewelleryshop.com/forum/member.php/264372-tyroneanthon819

By: hhe

hhe — Wed, 20 May 2009 11:11:26 +0000

Why do you even get to blog?

This is a joke.

By: sv

sv — Mon, 18 May 2009 21:37:29 +0000

“Which Foot is it?”

Seriously, who gives a fuck? Get a life already.

By: Jenn

Jenn — Mon, 18 May 2009 17:42:20 +0000

I’d have to watch the episode again to see if we get a better angle, but there’s nothing in these pictures to prove that the feet are together. The view is from a completely different angle that doesn’t allow you to see how much space is or is not between the feet.

It’s obvious that one foot is slightly in front of the other, a position that I feel is accounted for in the larger, from the back, feet apart shot that we have.

By: Cutter XXIII

Cutter XXIII — Sun, 17 May 2009 13:26:00 +0000

Ah, sorry ErasedSlate…I didn’t mean to direct that question at you then. Only at anyone who thinks it’s not the left foot.

[i](scans comments)[/i]

Which is almost no one. That’ll learn me for skimming.

By: triangulatedsignal

triangulatedsignal — Sun, 17 May 2009 12:29:00 +0000

it matters enough for you to read it and then leave a comment on it so im guessing yes hehe

By: tonymcnitt

tonymcnitt — Sat, 16 May 2009 21:02:28 +0000

I really don’t see what the problem is…it looks fine. The 3rd picture clearly shows enough room on the base to prove that it’s still the left foot, and the picture at night is a bit hard to tell but could easily still be the left foot. It appears that way, and the angle of the shot as well as the lighting make it a bit skeptical to start calling out continuity errors. I’m sure it’s always been the same foot. And the pictures from below ground really don’t have any bearing on this argument.

It’s the same foot. Big deal.

By: INawe

INawe — Sat, 16 May 2009 20:10:10 +0000

” LOST Blistereggs ”

lol

By: ErasedSlate

ErasedSlate — Sat, 16 May 2009 19:25:17 +0000

This is here because people actually had questions about it. The angle at which the fx were added were meant to leave doubt, otherwise, this could have easily been settled by a different angle or approach to the statue.

The conclusion of the article was that it is the left foot and nothing had changed from season 2. Re-read some of the comments, there is still doubt out there when it seems certain to me that it is the left foot. This is to give people the tools and material necessary to draw their own conclusions. And, please pardon me for for using hyberbole.

By: Cutter XXIII

Cutter XXIII — Sat, 16 May 2009 14:18:45 +0000

Biggest mystery??? Really?

It’s the left foot. Try using Photoshop, and superimpose the right foot from image 3 onto image 2. It fits.

Hey, ErasedSlate…WHO SHOT SHANNON? ‘Cause I hear it wasn’t really Ana Lucia.

By: Andy

Andy — Sat, 16 May 2009 12:11:52 +0000

“This image is inconclusive.”

Uh…no, it’s not. It’s very conclusively a left foot. I’m not sure why this article was even written.

By: ResidentGuy

ResidentGuy — Sat, 16 May 2009 08:32:18 +0000

It’s just a forced perspective issue. The picture of just the mystery foot is the left foot. It’s the same angle as when there are two feet and you are viewing it just below the horizon of the base of the statue.

By: Cecil

Cecil — Sat, 16 May 2009 07:17:34 +0000

Uh yeah, they’ve made a LOT of continuity errors. Need only read the comments above you to find one in this case – the position of the legs (apart before, together now)

By: Cecil

Cecil — Sat, 16 May 2009 07:14:20 +0000

I’m curious as to what exactly that headstone-looking thing is in picture 3. It also appears in the 1800s when the statue is whole. Significant?

By: Raul Lorcez

Raul Lorcez — Sat, 16 May 2009 04:21:30 +0000

The foot from the season 5 finale is NOT a right foot. What drug are you people taking? It’s clearly working.

By: Erikire

Erikire — Sat, 16 May 2009 01:33:39 +0000

Hell yeah! It’s just a freaking foot…

[[What, are you one of those foot fetishists???]]

By: Toga

Toga — Fri, 15 May 2009 23:16:44 +0000

I guess the obvious answer is who cares?

By: Matthew Perry

Matthew Perry — Fri, 15 May 2009 23:03:55 +0000

I can’t think of a less compelling mystery.

Well, aside from the fact that it isn’t really a mystery, since there is absolutely no evidence whatsoever to suggest that we are now seeing the right foot instead.

By: konstantine

konstantine — Fri, 15 May 2009 22:24:17 +0000

If the LOST effects people did not screw up and the foot we first see is intentionally then there are a few possibilities. Perhaps the foot differential between first shot from season two (LEFT FOOT) and the foot from the 5th season finale (RIGHT FOOT) can mean one thing the hydrogen bomb Jack & Juliet hurled into the heart of the islands electro magnetic energy field core caused a ripple in the time space continuum which affected the structure of the events on the island so much so that it affected the events leading to where the statue broke and which leg survived. Or it could mean that an earthquake or event so cataclysmic that it caused the island to rip apart and split the statue into two separate parts of the island. Just a theory….

By: javier

javier — Fri, 15 May 2009 21:26:04 +0000

Segun el angulo de la camara, teniendo en cuenta la posicion X del pie , dividio el angulo del coseno en el eje perpendicular, podriamos llegar a la conclusion que no es un pie, sino la mano

By: Baalzak

Baalzak — Fri, 15 May 2009 21:01:30 +0000

Clearly the left in every shot. There’s no discrepancy whatsoever, and it’s actually pretty clearly the left based on every piece of evidence in any of the shots. I’m a little confused as to how there’s even any doubt about this…

By: horselover

horselover — Fri, 15 May 2009 20:34:44 +0000

Well, I’m sure there’s some people out there who want to claim that the position of the foot slightly changing means we’re in an alternate future.

By: They'reNotDead

They'reNotDead — Fri, 15 May 2009 19:37:51 +0000

also forgot to mention that this would also account for the legs appearing as if the were together.

“Every time I think I’m out, they pull me back in!”

By: They'reNotDead

They'reNotDead — Fri, 15 May 2009 19:35:04 +0000

It’s definitely the left foot. All the discrepancies people are stating can all be attributed to perspective and parallax distortion. I am an animator by trade and one thing that is a constant hassle with 3D is making the silhouette (overall outlining shape) of an object consistently recognizable. An object may look amazing form a 45 degree angle, but change that to 75 degrees and u get a whole new silhouette. Camera positioning on the 3rd image posted is significantly different that the 2nd, it is further back and much further to the left. In my experience this would definitely account for the edge of the pedestal in relation to the foot being different. OK I’m done now. Gotta spend more time thinking about who “They” are.