As you’ve probably noticed, the title of a Lost episode often hints at more than just the episode’s story on a surface level. Many times, it provides a clue to its mythological messages as well. This was true of “316,” of “LaFleur,”* and now of “Namaste.” While Buddhist/Hindu principles pop up in Lost every so often, I was hoping that they might be a major theme of this episode due to its title, and I was not disappointed.
Namaste is a Hindu expression of meeting or parting that has made its way into yoga classes, spiritual circles, and Lost fan jargon in the Western world. However, much like Lost episode titles, there is a deeper meaning to the word. From a Buddhist or Hindu perspective, when one says, “namaste,” one means: “the light/spirit within me honors the light/spirit within you.” In other words, one person is recognizing that we are all one light or spirit and seeing themselves in the other person. Trippy, ain’t it? Even trippier is how this is related to another Eastern philosophy. If we are all one, then anything we do to others we are actually doing to ourselves. This is the very essence of karma.
Put simply, karma is the idea that our actions come back to us in this life or the next. In “Namaste” we see this theme repeated with just about every major character in the episode. Take Sayid. In his past, Sayid was a torturer of prisoners. In fact, Lost has already shown how us how karma caught up to him when he was tortured as Danielle’s prisoner. In another episode, Sayid has Ben as his prisoner and feels that he cannot be trusted and should be killed. Sound familiar? In “Namaste” Sayid is thought to be one of the Others by Radzinsky who feels that he cannot be trusted and should be killed. Of course, Ben was not killed and neither is Sayid. Still, the fact that the tables have turned becomes even more apparent when a young Ben visits Sayid in his cell. Perhaps Sayid’s Habitat for Humanity work has paid off his karmic torturing debt however because the only torture Ben doles out, is a mustard-less sandwich.
Speaking of Ben, he got some karmic payback in this episode too, based on his actions in “The Life and Death of Jeremy Bentham.” After getting all the information he needed out of an unsuspecting Locke, Ben took him out of commission with an extension cord to the neck. In “Namaste,” after getting all the information she needed out of an unsuspecting Ben, Sun took him out of commission with a paddle to the head. It didn’t kill him, but technically, Locke didn’t really die either. As in life, with Lost, what goes around comes around. In fact, this concept may give a hint to Ben’s ultimate intentions.
Ben has done a lot of killing in his time. So karmically speaking, when the freighter gang came to kill him, they should’ve succeeded. But as Ben points out in “Namaste,” they didn’t. Perhaps then, Ben hasn’t really killed anyone. Or, maybe he has killed but it wasn’t for selfish purposes but for the overall good of the world…or at least, the island. This might explain why instead of killing Ben, the freighter crew only wound up killing themselves. Now that’s instant karma.
Karma doesn’t always have to be bad—you can get good karma too. For most of his life, Sawyer had been a selfish conman. But after sacrificing himself to save Kate, he paid his dues and is now playing the role he’s always wanted—the new sheriff in town. His selfless karma has had a ripple effect too in that he’s now helping to save Kate and the gang again. Sometimes, when we pull a one-hit-wonder that’s directly opposed to how we’ve been most our lives, the universe throws us another test to see if our new ways stick. So far, for Sawyer, it seems as though they have. Of course, Sawyer still has a bit of a chip on his shoulder, which is probably a good thing. We all know what happens to Lost characters once they solve all their issues. (Add neck slicing sound effect here.)
Even without his pissy attitude towards Jack though, I still don’t think Sawyer’s story is done. His mythological match is Kate, not Juliet. If Kate is Princess Leia, then Sawyer is Han Solo to Jack’s Luke Skywalker. This kinda makes Juliet, Chewbacca—a loving partnership but nothing more. If you think that Juliet and Sawyer will last, ask yourself this question: why would the writers go out of their way to show us that Sawyer had real feelings for Kate during the Claire baby delivery flashback scene only to ignore it? They wouldn’t and they won’t. (BTW, why is it that Sawyer falls for women when they are helping to deliver babies—both Kate and Juliet? Perhaps because he longs for the family he never had?) Juliet’s purpose is to domesticate Sawyer—a skill he needs to learn if he’s ever going to have a successful relationship. Throughout her life, Kate always ran away, but by caring for Aaron she settled down. Now at last, the two of them are ready for one another! Watch the magic.
Even though Lost throws us a lot of twists and unexpected endings, it has yet to contradict classic mythological storytelling. Even Jack’s story is typical of the hero’s journey: rise, fall, redemption. As Sawyer cuttingly points out, Jack has always dealt with issues by reacting. This has brought him to drugs, alcohol, and nearly killing himself in the outside world. Now, he has been metaphorically reincarnated on the island to try again. His karma will bring him the same type of issues he had to deal with before, only now he’ll have to deal with them a bit differently. Jack must now take a subordinate role (Workman) until he can either successfully excel as a leader or come to terms with not being one. Either way, he must accept that he cannot fix every little problem. Similarly, Locke has the same issue. He has also been reincarnated to either succeed as a leader or accept that others are going to tell him what to do. Either way, he must stop being a victim and stand up for himself when others try to take advantage of him. There’s a big difference between being a team player and just being played.
Over a lifetime, karma serves to keep us stuck in the same loop of repeating occurrences until we step up and change our habits. It is like the metaphorical skipping record of time on Lost. What we do, keeps happening to us, causing us to do what we did before. Will Sayid try to torture or kill little Ben? Will big Ben seek revenge on Sun? Will Sawyer cheat on Juliet? Will Jack turn to drink and drugs when he can’t control his situation? The message of this season seems to be that it is time for the characters to move on or they will continue to be stuck in time. And stuck in their lives. With only 25 more episodes remaining, I think we’re going to finally see some real progress. Or else, expect a Lost spin-off.
*See “Lost In Myth” columns from these episodes for details.
Marc Oromaner is a New York City writer whose book, The Myth of Lost offers a simple solution to Lost and uncovers its hidden insight into the mysteries of life. He can be contacted in the discussion section of The Myth of Lost Facebook page: http://www.facebook.com/pages/The-Myth-of-LOST/34096821137
The Myth of Lost is available on Amazon: http://www.amazon.com/Myth-Lost-Solving-Mysteries-Understanding/dp/0595484565 and barnesandnoble.com: http://search.barnesandnoble.com/The-Myth-Of-Lost/Marc-Oromaner/e/9780595484560
19 Responses to “Marc Oromaner’s Lost In Myth: The Karma of “Namaste””
Leave a Reply
This site utilizes the Global Avatar standard developed by Gravatar. To set your avatar, click on the logo to the left.Return To Top
Loading ...
Microsoft Store
Certain spin-off’s might be interesting = The Dharma Years, explaining how Dharma started, more history of the island, history of the Others/Hostiles, etc. It could also cover the timeline of Richard, spanning the 50’s through the 70’s. I’d watch for sure.
Nice job! I really enjoyed this review.
“What we do, keeps happening to us, causing us to do what we did before.”
My thoughts exactly! http://5ws1h.wordpress.com/2009/02/27/it-happens-to-be/
Well, not exactly, but kinda
“One thing I have found that must be done to be present to who we are now is to resolve the past. Come to terms with what we have done in the past, resolve it, make amends if necessary to others but mostly to ourselves… The more you are able to let go of that past the more you can be present to yourself right now. [...] I couldn’t think my way into forgiveness – which is why I had been circling back and forth – it was only when I accepted (surrendered) to what had been, myself and others, that another doorway, some inner freedom, could open up. [...] Past and future disappear…there is total focus on what is happening now. [...] It reminds me that what we to do our selves we do to others.”
That’s a short excerpt from a conversation hold over at http://www.globalmindshift.com – a great site supporting the (r)evolution in consciosness and culture in our present time. Fits very well into this thread, doesn’t it?
Also very notable: “One cannot love others, until one is able to love the self of our being first.” – The Meaning of the hindu salutation “Namasté” is: “I honor the highest Self (Atman/God) in you which in truth is also in me.” In DHARMA, we are ONE (Buddha, spoken within Sangha).
Namaskar, fellow Losties
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LAYPIKc_HIA
“Your comment is awaiting moderation.” March 20, 8:25pm ?
I give it another try, this time without hyperlinks.
“One thing I have found that must be done to be present to who we are now is to resolve the past. Come to terms with what we have done in the past, resolve it, make amends if necessary to others but mostly to ourselves… The more you are able to let go of that past the more you can be present to yourself right now. [...] I couldn’t think my way into forgiveness – which is why I had been circling back and forth – it was only when I accepted (surrendered) to what had been, myself and others, that another doorway, some inner freedom, could open up. [...] Past and future disappear…there is total focus on what is happening now. [...] It reminds me that what we to do our selves we do to others.”
That’s a short excerpt from a conversation hold over at (…) a great site supporting the (r)evolution in consciosness and culture in our present time. Fits very well into this thread, doesn’t it?
Also very notable: “One cannot love others, until one is able to love the self of our being first.” – The Meaning of the hindu salutation “Namasté” is: “I honor the highest Self (Atman/God) in you which in truth is the same in me.” In DHARMA, we are ONE (Buddha, spoken within Sangha).
Namaskar, fellow Losties
Your blog post reminds me of a version of the God Paradox–that since God is everything and knows everything then He should know what it is like to not be Him. But he can’t because He is God and is everything and knows everything. So God created this illusionary world we live in where we are all a piece of Him, but don’t know it. In this way, God gets to know what its like to not be Him, while still being Him, i.e., we are all God.
I would love to see one of you tech-savvy fans out there put all of the beat-downs that Ben has taken from seasons 2-5 into a montage set to music. Please make this happen.
I like this very well written interpretation about the season. It offers exceptional insight into what LOST producers have tried to convey; their more profound philosophical message is FOUND here in this gem of a review.
The Chewbacca comparison really had me rolling on the floor laughing. However, if we are to infer that the writers of LOST carefully chose the name “Juliet” as carefully as they have chosen many other names for characters, the Chewbacca comparison falls sort of flat (still howling with laughter, though). I am perhaps more inclined to believe that Juliet will suffer the same or similiar tragic fate as that of Shakespeare’s Juliet (which is not at all like the warm fuzzy, fate of dear Chewey! )
Glad you found the post helpful in interpreting the messages of “Lost.” I agree that Juliet is ALSO the star-crossed lover Juliet (different background from James “Romeo” Sawyer, etc.). There are multiple levels in which character archetypes and myths can be interpreted (See the “316″ Lost in Myth for more on this). Sometimes one character can even be a metaphor for conflicting archetypes. As you guessed, I was being a bit tongue-and-cheek with Chewbacca, though, as you also inferred, there is some truth to it.
I’m not sure yet if Juliet will suffer, or fall for Goodwin when he arrives on the island–perhaps before marrying Harper!
I love your posts
Great post.
Now I’m going to be imagining Chewbacca roaring whenever Juliet has lines. Hee.
Hi Marc, This article is fabulous. I have been a fan of yours since I bought your book at the NYC LOST Premiere party (you signed it with Nasmaste). I only read a few pages at a time, as I want to savor it and really understand it (which I so do).
Have you thought about doing a “book on CD”. I know many people that would love that.
I am a big follower of your blogs. Very interested in your theories. My (unpublished/unblogged) theory is based on the Collective and Global Consciousness. But not just related to the story going on in LOST. It is about the GC of the fans and JJ Abrams genius. More another time. Best, Joanne
Thanks Jojo. You must’ve liked the section of “The Myth of Lost” where I offered a similar sub-theory about the audience being the grand experiment of LOST–a 6 year experiment that taught millions of people that we are all connected, that the challenges that are thrown at us help make us stronger, and that we should look for the clues that can help gives us answers about our lives. Admittedly, I didn’t explore it much so there’s plenty of room for you to do so if you want.
As far as JJ’s genius, as you may also remember from the book, I prefer to think of creatives as shaman that are able to tap into the creative (un)conscious and relay messages for the rest of us. Still, he ranks up there with M. Night Shyamalan (SHyAMAlaN) as one of the more talented and clear shamans out there! Since I believe we are all one, I believe that we all have access to the same info, some of us are just more in tune with it than others.
wow! what a great post. i love the leia/hans/luke/chewbacca comparison…LOL
but overall, i think you nailed it!
Another great installment following last week. Really philosophical approach to the show. Makes one think
wonderfully silly LOST video review:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R5Si6z5PunI
A great review, and somehow you found a way to make this insane season still apply to my life as much as the more character-driven seasons. Nicely done.
[...] Marc Oromaner’s Lost In Myth: The Karma of “Namaste [...]
Thanks to everybody for the great feedback.
Namaste!