<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Marc Oromaner’s Lost In Myth: Why LOST Can Be A Substitute For “Willy Wonka”</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-in-myth/marc-oromaner%E2%80%99s-lost-in-myth-why-lost-can-be-a-substitute-for-%E2%80%9Cwilly-wonka%E2%80%9D/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-in-myth/marc-oromaner%e2%80%99s-lost-in-myth-why-lost-can-be-a-substitute-for-%e2%80%9cwilly-wonka%e2%80%9d/</link>
	<description>Everything Lost found here.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 04:38:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Annetta Dobkins</title>
		<link>http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-in-myth/marc-oromaner%e2%80%99s-lost-in-myth-why-lost-can-be-a-substitute-for-%e2%80%9cwilly-wonka%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-851615</link>
		<dc:creator>Annetta Dobkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 14:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.docarzt.com/?p=10002#comment-851615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Super-Duper site! I am Loving it!! Will come back again, Im taking your feed also, Thanks	&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.burjkhalifatickets.net/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;burj khalifa tickets&lt;/A&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Super-Duper site! I am Loving it!! Will come back again, Im taking your feed also, Thanks	<a href="http://www.burjkhalifatickets.net/" rel="nofollow">burj khalifa tickets</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Oromaner’s Lost In Myth: Everybody Loves Answers DocArzt&#39;s LOST Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-in-myth/marc-oromaner%e2%80%99s-lost-in-myth-why-lost-can-be-a-substitute-for-%e2%80%9cwilly-wonka%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-70323</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Oromaner’s Lost In Myth: Everybody Loves Answers DocArzt&#39;s LOST Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 18:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.docarzt.com/?p=10002#comment-70323</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] I compared Lost to the Willy Wonka film because of the similarities with the candidate process (see “Lost In Myth: Why LOST Can Be A Substitute For ‘Willy Wonka’”). Each child/Lostie is tempted with their own personal issue to see which one would overcome it and [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I compared Lost to the Willy Wonka film because of the similarities with the candidate process (see “Lost In Myth: Why LOST Can Be A Substitute For ‘Willy Wonka’”). Each child/Lostie is tempted with their own personal issue to see which one would overcome it and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: When Falls the Coliseum &#187; Lost in myth: Everybody loves answers</title>
		<link>http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-in-myth/marc-oromaner%e2%80%99s-lost-in-myth-why-lost-can-be-a-substitute-for-%e2%80%9cwilly-wonka%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-70307</link>
		<dc:creator>When Falls the Coliseum &#187; Lost in myth: Everybody loves answers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 16:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.docarzt.com/?p=10002#comment-70307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] I compared Lost to the Willy Wonka film because of the similarities with the candidate process (see &#8220;Lost In Myth: Why LOST Can Be A Substitute For ‘Willy Wonka&#8217;&#8221;). Each child/Lostie is tempted with their own personal issue to see which one would overcome it and [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I compared Lost to the Willy Wonka film because of the similarities with the candidate process (see &#8220;Lost In Myth: Why LOST Can Be A Substitute For ‘Willy Wonka&#8217;&#8221;). Each child/Lostie is tempted with their own personal issue to see which one would overcome it and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Usagi</title>
		<link>http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-in-myth/marc-oromaner%e2%80%99s-lost-in-myth-why-lost-can-be-a-substitute-for-%e2%80%9cwilly-wonka%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-70193</link>
		<dc:creator>Usagi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 05:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.docarzt.com/?p=10002#comment-70193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pretty long-winded, but overall not bad. However...

&quot;Are the whispers the dead souls on the island, and the reason bodies had to be buried was because the souls would possess them?&quot;

Huuuuuuh????   That makes no sense at all... Bodies are buried out of respect, among other reasons.  Also Season 1&#039;s &quot;Adam and Eve&quot; were not buried, but left in the cave.  No one&#039;s been possessed before, and I am not sure that Sayid is.  If he is possessed,he would be the first that we know of.  Not sure where this idea came from. 

&quot;If so, has the ghost of Rousseau possessed Claire?&quot;

Claire isn&#039;t dead.

&quot;Is the reason why Claire seemed to recognize Jin because she is actually Rousseau?&quot;

Why wouldn&#039;t Claire know Jin?  They were on the plane together, on the beach together, etc.  Don&#039;t know why claire wouldn&#039;t know him.  Rousseau had very little contact with Jin anyway.  So this is also a very strange and unnecessary question.

I am confused why you would pad an otherwise decent blog with irrelevant questions.  LOST has so many better questions to draw from, there is no reason to make up such silliness.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty long-winded, but overall not bad. However&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;Are the whispers the dead souls on the island, and the reason bodies had to be buried was because the souls would possess them?&#8221;</p>
<p>Huuuuuuh????   That makes no sense at all&#8230; Bodies are buried out of respect, among other reasons.  Also Season 1&#8242;s &#8220;Adam and Eve&#8221; were not buried, but left in the cave.  No one&#8217;s been possessed before, and I am not sure that Sayid is.  If he is possessed,he would be the first that we know of.  Not sure where this idea came from. </p>
<p>&#8220;If so, has the ghost of Rousseau possessed Claire?&#8221;</p>
<p>Claire isn&#8217;t dead.</p>
<p>&#8220;Is the reason why Claire seemed to recognize Jin because she is actually Rousseau?&#8221;</p>
<p>Why wouldn&#8217;t Claire know Jin?  They were on the plane together, on the beach together, etc.  Don&#8217;t know why claire wouldn&#8217;t know him.  Rousseau had very little contact with Jin anyway.  So this is also a very strange and unnecessary question.</p>
<p>I am confused why you would pad an otherwise decent blog with irrelevant questions.  LOST has so many better questions to draw from, there is no reason to make up such silliness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Oromaner’s Lost In Myth: “Sundown”—Temptation of the Dark Side DocArzt&#8217;s LOST Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-in-myth/marc-oromaner%e2%80%99s-lost-in-myth-why-lost-can-be-a-substitute-for-%e2%80%9cwilly-wonka%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-61407</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Oromaner’s Lost In Myth: “Sundown”—Temptation of the Dark Side DocArzt&#8217;s LOST Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 05:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.docarzt.com/?p=10002#comment-61407</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] I mentioned in “Why LOST Can Be A Substitute For ‘Willy Wonka’” it’s like that scene in The Matrix when agent Smith tells Morpheus that humans rejected the first [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I mentioned in “Why LOST Can Be A Substitute For ‘Willy Wonka’” it’s like that scene in The Matrix when agent Smith tells Morpheus that humans rejected the first [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kaptan36</title>
		<link>http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-in-myth/marc-oromaner%e2%80%99s-lost-in-myth-why-lost-can-be-a-substitute-for-%e2%80%9cwilly-wonka%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-59190</link>
		<dc:creator>kaptan36</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 23:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.docarzt.com/?p=10002#comment-59190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Where to begin.... 1.) Jack&#039;s beard timeline in season 4-5: Minor, I know, but when Locke visits Jack off island in the hospital, Jack has roughly 2 weeks worth of facial hair. Locke is killed roughly a few days after this, and then his funeral must be within a few days after that. When Jack goes to the funeral parlor he has 6 months worth of beard if not more, not to mention that the week in between he some how manages to take quite a few flights hoping to crash, becomes addicted to pills and booze, loses his job, tries suicide, saves a crash victim, gets visited by his ex wife, etc., etc..... There is just way too much of a problem with this timeline for me to explain here, but if you go back and watch this, you will agree major timeline screw up.

2.) ETHAN&#039;s timeline. They reveal in season 5 Ethan was born in 1977. Flight 815 crashes in 2004. You mean to tell me that when he infiltrates the camp, that Ethan is only 27??? Really? C&#039;mon man! And where did he get all of this medical experience if no one is allowed to leave the island? In a deleted scene, Ethan even tells Jack that he had a wife who died during childbirth; while this could&#039;ve been a lie, I don&#039;t think that was the intent, what with him working to cure the fertility problem and all. The only reasonable explanation for this would be some kind of off island accidental time travel and he aged when returned sorta thing, but that&#039;s a huge stretch.

3.) Michael &amp; Walt&#039;s off island adventures: The timeline between when they leave and when Michael returns is absolutely absurd, not to mention all the stuff that happens in between. So if you do the math, only 2 weeks, maybe 3, pass between when Michael &amp; Walt leave and when Naomi parachutes onto the island from the freighter, which Michael is on. Now keep in mind that it probably would have taken a week for the freighter to even get to the vicinity of the island from California, where I am guessing they must have left from; not to mention the day of flying Michael would&#039;ve had to do to get there, because I believe he lived in New York. Anyways... In that time frame, Michael &amp; Walt steer their crappy little boat to rescue(which they never explain), or if you find it more plausible, let&#039;s say in a day&#039;s time they manage to hit another island. Okay, then how with no money or passports do they get home? They couldn&#039;t have taken a flight or any legitimate means of travel without the red flag of flight 815 survivors going up. So you would assume that unless there was some help from the Others(which would be totally contrary to the story), then they would have probably had to have stowed away on a freighter or something just to get back to the states undetected. Which in itself is ironic, because the best way to have explained the whole thing would have been for them to have been picked up by Widmore&#039;s freighter, Michael just simply tells them he&#039;s a flight 815 survivor and about the island, they hold him against his will onboard to help them find the island and take Walt (via helicopter) off the freighter and to the nearest island (since the actor was now a teenager and couldn&#039;t be on camera). Maybe even the boat Michael had taken off the island had instructions from Ben about the freighter and what he would have to do and say when they picked him up, and I&#039;m sure the writers could have found some way Ben could&#039;ve connived him into doing it. I am an amateur writer, and that is a way better explanation and would have also been easier and cheaper to film, but this is what we got; In 3 weeks Michael &amp; Walt manage their implausible journey back to the states undetected. Michael drops Walt off with his mom, and manages to get a job, an apartment, and car, without accessing his own bank account(once again, red flag) and tries to kill himself a few times, and is visited by Mr. Friendly, who also if you do the math out, should have been killed at this point by Sawyer. There is no way, Mr. Friendly could have left the island, met up w/ Michael, and gotten back in time to be killed by Sawyer. Ugh... Man I&#039;m getting exhausted just thinking of every angle in which this plotline was god awful. Once again if you wanted to see what I&#039;m talking about watch seasons 3 &amp; 4, do out the math of the days, and everything that happens and you&#039;ll see what I mean.

     There are many other huge plotholes and problems with the continuity; some which are the faults of the writers (like the setup of Pierre Chang to be the Montand who is missing an arm Rousseau talks about in season 1, and he shows up w/ a prostetic arm in season 2, but never actually loses an arm and the 2 are never connected?!?!); and some which weren&#039;t the fault of the writers, sorta(like most of the religious overtones and the church that never gets built, because at the height of his fame the actor who plays Eko, decides to leave the show to make and star in an autobiographical movie about his own life which then becomes a straight to dvd movie released only in select countries, mostly 3rd world. Way to go with the career choice there buddy). 
    Now I know it sounds like I&#039;m bashing the show and the writers, and maybe I&#039;m bashing the writers a bit, but for a show that relies so heavy on continuity and purposely has the audience looking for little things that tie the story together, these things that I&#039;ve mentioned are just major plotholes that could&#039;ve been easily avoided if more care was taken. Having said that, I still love the show, and I will even go as far as saying I think it is the best sci-fi show and primetime drama of all time, with an amazing cast; but you take the good w/ the bad, and this is just me pointing out the bad.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where to begin&#8230;. 1.) Jack&#8217;s beard timeline in season 4-5: Minor, I know, but when Locke visits Jack off island in the hospital, Jack has roughly 2 weeks worth of facial hair. Locke is killed roughly a few days after this, and then his funeral must be within a few days after that. When Jack goes to the funeral parlor he has 6 months worth of beard if not more, not to mention that the week in between he some how manages to take quite a few flights hoping to crash, becomes addicted to pills and booze, loses his job, tries suicide, saves a crash victim, gets visited by his ex wife, etc., etc&#8230;.. There is just way too much of a problem with this timeline for me to explain here, but if you go back and watch this, you will agree major timeline screw up.</p>
<p>2.) ETHAN&#8217;s timeline. They reveal in season 5 Ethan was born in 1977. Flight 815 crashes in 2004. You mean to tell me that when he infiltrates the camp, that Ethan is only 27??? Really? C&#8217;mon man! And where did he get all of this medical experience if no one is allowed to leave the island? In a deleted scene, Ethan even tells Jack that he had a wife who died during childbirth; while this could&#8217;ve been a lie, I don&#8217;t think that was the intent, what with him working to cure the fertility problem and all. The only reasonable explanation for this would be some kind of off island accidental time travel and he aged when returned sorta thing, but that&#8217;s a huge stretch.</p>
<p>3.) Michael &amp; Walt&#8217;s off island adventures: The timeline between when they leave and when Michael returns is absolutely absurd, not to mention all the stuff that happens in between. So if you do the math, only 2 weeks, maybe 3, pass between when Michael &amp; Walt leave and when Naomi parachutes onto the island from the freighter, which Michael is on. Now keep in mind that it probably would have taken a week for the freighter to even get to the vicinity of the island from California, where I am guessing they must have left from; not to mention the day of flying Michael would&#8217;ve had to do to get there, because I believe he lived in New York. Anyways&#8230; In that time frame, Michael &amp; Walt steer their crappy little boat to rescue(which they never explain), or if you find it more plausible, let&#8217;s say in a day&#8217;s time they manage to hit another island. Okay, then how with no money or passports do they get home? They couldn&#8217;t have taken a flight or any legitimate means of travel without the red flag of flight 815 survivors going up. So you would assume that unless there was some help from the Others(which would be totally contrary to the story), then they would have probably had to have stowed away on a freighter or something just to get back to the states undetected. Which in itself is ironic, because the best way to have explained the whole thing would have been for them to have been picked up by Widmore&#8217;s freighter, Michael just simply tells them he&#8217;s a flight 815 survivor and about the island, they hold him against his will onboard to help them find the island and take Walt (via helicopter) off the freighter and to the nearest island (since the actor was now a teenager and couldn&#8217;t be on camera). Maybe even the boat Michael had taken off the island had instructions from Ben about the freighter and what he would have to do and say when they picked him up, and I&#8217;m sure the writers could have found some way Ben could&#8217;ve connived him into doing it. I am an amateur writer, and that is a way better explanation and would have also been easier and cheaper to film, but this is what we got; In 3 weeks Michael &amp; Walt manage their implausible journey back to the states undetected. Michael drops Walt off with his mom, and manages to get a job, an apartment, and car, without accessing his own bank account(once again, red flag) and tries to kill himself a few times, and is visited by Mr. Friendly, who also if you do the math out, should have been killed at this point by Sawyer. There is no way, Mr. Friendly could have left the island, met up w/ Michael, and gotten back in time to be killed by Sawyer. Ugh&#8230; Man I&#8217;m getting exhausted just thinking of every angle in which this plotline was god awful. Once again if you wanted to see what I&#8217;m talking about watch seasons 3 &amp; 4, do out the math of the days, and everything that happens and you&#8217;ll see what I mean.</p>
<p>     There are many other huge plotholes and problems with the continuity; some which are the faults of the writers (like the setup of Pierre Chang to be the Montand who is missing an arm Rousseau talks about in season 1, and he shows up w/ a prostetic arm in season 2, but never actually loses an arm and the 2 are never connected?!?!); and some which weren&#8217;t the fault of the writers, sorta(like most of the religious overtones and the church that never gets built, because at the height of his fame the actor who plays Eko, decides to leave the show to make and star in an autobiographical movie about his own life which then becomes a straight to dvd movie released only in select countries, mostly 3rd world. Way to go with the career choice there buddy).<br />
    Now I know it sounds like I&#8217;m bashing the show and the writers, and maybe I&#8217;m bashing the writers a bit, but for a show that relies so heavy on continuity and purposely has the audience looking for little things that tie the story together, these things that I&#8217;ve mentioned are just major plotholes that could&#8217;ve been easily avoided if more care was taken. Having said that, I still love the show, and I will even go as far as saying I think it is the best sci-fi show and primetime drama of all time, with an amazing cast; but you take the good w/ the bad, and this is just me pointing out the bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kaptan36</title>
		<link>http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-in-myth/marc-oromaner%e2%80%99s-lost-in-myth-why-lost-can-be-a-substitute-for-%e2%80%9cwilly-wonka%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-59155</link>
		<dc:creator>kaptan36</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 20:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.docarzt.com/?p=10002#comment-59155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh man, I love the show, but you could write a whole book about all the continuity errors and errors from dropped plotlines and such. Someone should put up a post of the top 20 mistakes/errors in Lost continuity history. The whole Michael off island stuff and Ethan’s timeline would def have to be at the top of the list.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh man, I love the show, but you could write a whole book about all the continuity errors and errors from dropped plotlines and such. Someone should put up a post of the top 20 mistakes/errors in Lost continuity history. The whole Michael off island stuff and Ethan’s timeline would def have to be at the top of the list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fox</title>
		<link>http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-in-myth/marc-oromaner%e2%80%99s-lost-in-myth-why-lost-can-be-a-substitute-for-%e2%80%9cwilly-wonka%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-59139</link>
		<dc:creator>Fox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 20:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.docarzt.com/?p=10002#comment-59139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[JUGHEAD was supposed to spare everyone on the plane from their respective misery (and joy! think of sun and jin) on the island. Yet, at the same time, many were killed by it (inhabitants of the island) and others were prevented from ever arriving (or being born). It wasn&#039;t 0 kill, but it was definitely convenient to the 815 people.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JUGHEAD was supposed to spare everyone on the plane from their respective misery (and joy! think of sun and jin) on the island. Yet, at the same time, many were killed by it (inhabitants of the island) and others were prevented from ever arriving (or being born). It wasn&#8217;t 0 kill, but it was definitely convenient to the 815 people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pam</title>
		<link>http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-in-myth/marc-oromaner%e2%80%99s-lost-in-myth-why-lost-can-be-a-substitute-for-%e2%80%9cwilly-wonka%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-59087</link>
		<dc:creator>Pam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 15:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.docarzt.com/?p=10002#comment-59087</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, he is alive.  Only his career is dead.  :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, he is alive.  Only his career is dead.  <img src='http://www.docarzt.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HansM</title>
		<link>http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-in-myth/marc-oromaner%e2%80%99s-lost-in-myth-why-lost-can-be-a-substitute-for-%e2%80%9cwilly-wonka%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-59008</link>
		<dc:creator>HansM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 01:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.docarzt.com/?p=10002#comment-59008</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since Jalocke brough up the Star Trek reference , i got another that probably got overlooked by all the action. It just came to me after a very relaxing bath that when Locke enters the teacher´s lounge and meets with Ben Linus asking for some tea that there used to another bald guy about Locke´s age who spent an awful lot of time sitting in a chair and whose favourite qoute at the time seemed to be &quot;Tea. Earl Grey. Hot&quot;. That guy was of course Jean-Luc Picard, Captain of the Enterprise-D and Enterprise-E in StarTrek: The Next Generation and subsequent Motion Pictures StarTrek 6-10.
Would that suggest that there still is some leadership quality in ALT-Locke yet to unravel?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:JeanLucPicard.jpg]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since Jalocke brough up the Star Trek reference , i got another that probably got overlooked by all the action. It just came to me after a very relaxing bath that when Locke enters the teacher´s lounge and meets with Ben Linus asking for some tea that there used to another bald guy about Locke´s age who spent an awful lot of time sitting in a chair and whose favourite qoute at the time seemed to be &#8220;Tea. Earl Grey. Hot&#8221;. That guy was of course Jean-Luc Picard, Captain of the Enterprise-D and Enterprise-E in StarTrek: The Next Generation and subsequent Motion Pictures StarTrek 6-10.<br />
Would that suggest that there still is some leadership quality in ALT-Locke yet to unravel?<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:JeanLucPicard.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:JeanLucPicard.jpg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benmanben</title>
		<link>http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-in-myth/marc-oromaner%e2%80%99s-lost-in-myth-why-lost-can-be-a-substitute-for-%e2%80%9cwilly-wonka%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-58980</link>
		<dc:creator>Benmanben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 19:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.docarzt.com/?p=10002#comment-58980</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I&#039;m so glad someone mentioned this!
I had thought of it after hearing about the candidates, and remembered the Oceanic Gold Passes. I was like &quot;It&#039;s Willy Wonka!&quot;

I told the idea to my brother, who thought I was crazy.
I&#039;m glad I&#039;m not the only one who noticed. 

However, I don&#039;t think MIB is slugworth. Slugworth got along with Wonka in the movie. However, in the book, Slugworth really was evil... I think.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>!!!!!!!!!!!!!<br />
I&#8217;m so glad someone mentioned this!<br />
I had thought of it after hearing about the candidates, and remembered the Oceanic Gold Passes. I was like &#8220;It&#8217;s Willy Wonka!&#8221;</p>
<p>I told the idea to my brother, who thought I was crazy.<br />
I&#8217;m glad I&#8217;m not the only one who noticed. </p>
<p>However, I don&#8217;t think MIB is slugworth. Slugworth got along with Wonka in the movie. However, in the book, Slugworth really was evil&#8230; I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Handsome Smitty</title>
		<link>http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-in-myth/marc-oromaner%e2%80%99s-lost-in-myth-why-lost-can-be-a-substitute-for-%e2%80%9cwilly-wonka%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-58965</link>
		<dc:creator>Handsome Smitty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 18:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.docarzt.com/?p=10002#comment-58965</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Glad people finally agreeing with me. Locke is a loser. But worry not all you Locke-nuts, Locke will be redeemed in the sideways reality©.

Now, if I could only convince others Ben Bad Bad Ben!!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad people finally agreeing with me. Locke is a loser. But worry not all you Locke-nuts, Locke will be redeemed in the sideways reality©.</p>
<p>Now, if I could only convince others Ben Bad Bad Ben!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Handsome Smitty</title>
		<link>http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-in-myth/marc-oromaner%e2%80%99s-lost-in-myth-why-lost-can-be-a-substitute-for-%e2%80%9cwilly-wonka%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-58964</link>
		<dc:creator>Handsome Smitty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 17:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.docarzt.com/?p=10002#comment-58964</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clarity, at last.

Amen, brother.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clarity, at last.</p>
<p>Amen, brother.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jalocke</title>
		<link>http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-in-myth/marc-oromaner%e2%80%99s-lost-in-myth-why-lost-can-be-a-substitute-for-%e2%80%9cwilly-wonka%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-58944</link>
		<dc:creator>Jalocke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 16:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.docarzt.com/?p=10002#comment-58944</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And Darth Vader thought he was restoring order to a galaxy in chaos. Bernie Madoff was just trying to earn some extra money for his family. Hell Jafar just wanted to understand the greater mysteries of the universe. Real bad guys never think they are doing evil. It&#039;s always for the greater good. But how many have died in the name of the greater good, where in fact they were dying for the confused ramblings of one man. I personally can&#039;t see a single situation where Locke&#039;s leadership has led to anything but death and destruction.

From the perspective of the Losties, and from those of us who live in real life, its actually fairly reasonable to question the mysticism of the island. I mean honestly, if we are in  that situation if any of us starts being mystically in tune with the island we crashed on, and talks about island sacrifices... well that man is crazy in my books. Whether or not he ends up being right is irrelevant. In that case its an outlier. And even if Locke is right about the island, as it appears to be, his leadership and his method of handling those issues was nothing short of a catastrophic failure.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And Darth Vader thought he was restoring order to a galaxy in chaos. Bernie Madoff was just trying to earn some extra money for his family. Hell Jafar just wanted to understand the greater mysteries of the universe. Real bad guys never think they are doing evil. It&#8217;s always for the greater good. But how many have died in the name of the greater good, where in fact they were dying for the confused ramblings of one man. I personally can&#8217;t see a single situation where Locke&#8217;s leadership has led to anything but death and destruction.</p>
<p>From the perspective of the Losties, and from those of us who live in real life, its actually fairly reasonable to question the mysticism of the island. I mean honestly, if we are in  that situation if any of us starts being mystically in tune with the island we crashed on, and talks about island sacrifices&#8230; well that man is crazy in my books. Whether or not he ends up being right is irrelevant. In that case its an outlier. And even if Locke is right about the island, as it appears to be, his leadership and his method of handling those issues was nothing short of a catastrophic failure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ambivalentman</title>
		<link>http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-in-myth/marc-oromaner%e2%80%99s-lost-in-myth-why-lost-can-be-a-substitute-for-%e2%80%9cwilly-wonka%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-58933</link>
		<dc:creator>Ambivalentman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 15:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.docarzt.com/?p=10002#comment-58933</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great article, Marc. As always, good food for thought.

I&#039;d like to chime in on the Locke debate here in the comments section. While I think with our outside perspective it&#039;s easy to see Locke as a selfish character, it&#039;s important to understand that he doesn&#039;t see himself the same way. In his own mind, he&#039;s doing the will of the Island. At this time, then, it&#039;s easy to see him as a terrorist (which was brought up earlier). Certainly his behavior leads us to this conclusion. At the same time, as the nature of the Island is slowly revealed, we will develop a different perspective on the matter. Locke may still be a savior; maybe he was legitimately doing the Island&#039;s will, whatever that may be. In a sense, he was protecting it already by destroying every last form of communication with the outside world.

I&#039;m not going to say that Locke is the savior, though. I&#039;m still banking on Jack as our ultimate hero, especially as he&#039;s beginning to embrace being a man of faith in the Temple. After all, Jack was the character we were first introduced to, which in most heroic tales indicates who our hero is. Perhaps &quot;LOST&#039;s&quot; biggest red herring was giving us enough characters that we lose sight of Jack&#039;s role as savior. He definitely fits the bill: accepts the call, faces the trials, and most recently has entered the innermost cave. He has come out of the trials with renewed perspective and vigor. He&#039;s confused, yes, but stronger.

Once again, great article. Only the good ones spark this much debate.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article, Marc. As always, good food for thought.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to chime in on the Locke debate here in the comments section. While I think with our outside perspective it&#8217;s easy to see Locke as a selfish character, it&#8217;s important to understand that he doesn&#8217;t see himself the same way. In his own mind, he&#8217;s doing the will of the Island. At this time, then, it&#8217;s easy to see him as a terrorist (which was brought up earlier). Certainly his behavior leads us to this conclusion. At the same time, as the nature of the Island is slowly revealed, we will develop a different perspective on the matter. Locke may still be a savior; maybe he was legitimately doing the Island&#8217;s will, whatever that may be. In a sense, he was protecting it already by destroying every last form of communication with the outside world.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not going to say that Locke is the savior, though. I&#8217;m still banking on Jack as our ultimate hero, especially as he&#8217;s beginning to embrace being a man of faith in the Temple. After all, Jack was the character we were first introduced to, which in most heroic tales indicates who our hero is. Perhaps &#8220;LOST&#8217;s&#8221; biggest red herring was giving us enough characters that we lose sight of Jack&#8217;s role as savior. He definitely fits the bill: accepts the call, faces the trials, and most recently has entered the innermost cave. He has come out of the trials with renewed perspective and vigor. He&#8217;s confused, yes, but stronger.</p>
<p>Once again, great article. Only the good ones spark this much debate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jalocke</title>
		<link>http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-in-myth/marc-oromaner%e2%80%99s-lost-in-myth-why-lost-can-be-a-substitute-for-%e2%80%9cwilly-wonka%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-58869</link>
		<dc:creator>Jalocke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 06:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.docarzt.com/?p=10002#comment-58869</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whether or not it was Boone&#039;s decision to go up there, why did Locke lie about the cause of death? Why did Locke run off in a guilt ridden stupor? Locke felt responsible and yet wasn&#039;t there to answer questions or provide any help. It&#039;s entirely possible Jack could have saved Boone&#039;s life had he known what was actually wrong with his patient. He may not have pulled the trigger, but Locke&#039;s actions directly led to the death of Boone, and when confronted with this, resorted to the excuse of, &quot;a sacrifice the island demanded.&quot; Excuse me? Who told him that? Thats his own faith coming in to excuse away a death which occurred on his hands.

Also I don&#039;t buy this stuff about having the best interests of everyone in mind. Sayid seemed happy enough to me, volunteering and doing his part. Locke had no reason to think Kate wasn&#039;t happy, and while Hurley was in a mental hospital he seemed to be doing okay. Locke selfishly wanted to bring them back because he felt that without them he could not complete his destiny. And do you want to know why no one went with him? Because he&#039;s a poor leader and a poor friend. Never has he put the best interests of another in front of his own. Losing Helen was his fault, as he couldn&#039;t &quot;let go&quot; even when he finally had someone who loved him. 

You know maybe Locke himself put it best. Let&#039;s remember a conversation between Boone and Locke all the way back from Season 1

BOONE: Red shirt.
LOCKE: Huh?
BOONE: Ever watch Star Trek?
LOCKE: Nah, not really.
BOONE: The crew guys that would go down to the planet with the main guys, the captain and the guy with the pointy ears, they always wore red shirts. And they always got killed.
LOCKE: Yeah?
BOONE: Yeah.
LOCKE: Sounds like a piss-poor captain.*

*courtesy Lostpedia]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whether or not it was Boone&#8217;s decision to go up there, why did Locke lie about the cause of death? Why did Locke run off in a guilt ridden stupor? Locke felt responsible and yet wasn&#8217;t there to answer questions or provide any help. It&#8217;s entirely possible Jack could have saved Boone&#8217;s life had he known what was actually wrong with his patient. He may not have pulled the trigger, but Locke&#8217;s actions directly led to the death of Boone, and when confronted with this, resorted to the excuse of, &#8220;a sacrifice the island demanded.&#8221; Excuse me? Who told him that? Thats his own faith coming in to excuse away a death which occurred on his hands.</p>
<p>Also I don&#8217;t buy this stuff about having the best interests of everyone in mind. Sayid seemed happy enough to me, volunteering and doing his part. Locke had no reason to think Kate wasn&#8217;t happy, and while Hurley was in a mental hospital he seemed to be doing okay. Locke selfishly wanted to bring them back because he felt that without them he could not complete his destiny. And do you want to know why no one went with him? Because he&#8217;s a poor leader and a poor friend. Never has he put the best interests of another in front of his own. Losing Helen was his fault, as he couldn&#8217;t &#8220;let go&#8221; even when he finally had someone who loved him. </p>
<p>You know maybe Locke himself put it best. Let&#8217;s remember a conversation between Boone and Locke all the way back from Season 1</p>
<p>BOONE: Red shirt.<br />
LOCKE: Huh?<br />
BOONE: Ever watch Star Trek?<br />
LOCKE: Nah, not really.<br />
BOONE: The crew guys that would go down to the planet with the main guys, the captain and the guy with the pointy ears, they always wore red shirts. And they always got killed.<br />
LOCKE: Yeah?<br />
BOONE: Yeah.<br />
LOCKE: Sounds like a piss-poor captain.*</p>
<p>*courtesy Lostpedia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer</title>
		<link>http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-in-myth/marc-oromaner%e2%80%99s-lost-in-myth-why-lost-can-be-a-substitute-for-%e2%80%9cwilly-wonka%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-58849</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 02:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.docarzt.com/?p=10002#comment-58849</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Naomi as &quot;young and brave&quot;? I got the impression, rather, that she was the only one of the non-military freightees who was fully informed about the purpose and intent of Keamy&#039;s group - and therefore a party to murder herself. Anyone who knows about Keamy&#039;s nature and still volunteers for a mission to bring him onto an island pretty much is asking for some karmic retribution. 

I think that&#039;s the actual reason people didn&#039;t care about Naomi&#039;s death. Because she didn&#039;t care about their death or really about the other freightees who also met unfortunate ends after she recruited them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Naomi as &#8220;young and brave&#8221;? I got the impression, rather, that she was the only one of the non-military freightees who was fully informed about the purpose and intent of Keamy&#8217;s group &#8211; and therefore a party to murder herself. Anyone who knows about Keamy&#8217;s nature and still volunteers for a mission to bring him onto an island pretty much is asking for some karmic retribution. </p>
<p>I think that&#8217;s the actual reason people didn&#8217;t care about Naomi&#8217;s death. Because she didn&#8217;t care about their death or really about the other freightees who also met unfortunate ends after she recruited them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanielleB</title>
		<link>http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-in-myth/marc-oromaner%e2%80%99s-lost-in-myth-why-lost-can-be-a-substitute-for-%e2%80%9cwilly-wonka%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-58824</link>
		<dc:creator>DanielleB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 21:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.docarzt.com/?p=10002#comment-58824</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Enjoyed your perspective.    The end of Willy Wonka (book and both movies) has Willy blasting off in a glass elevator and a complete feel good warm fuzzy ending.     Is that what we what for the end of LOST?   Dancing around the fire with Obi-Wan/Anakin (the young or old one?)&amp; Yoda.   I sure didn&#039;t get the sense from Dogan that he has a feel good role as the temple head.   The end I foresee will have satifing wrap up to many of the questions yet there will be darkness.   Like  the end of King Arther - The kingdom has been restored, yet his best friend, Lancelot, has betrayed him, his wife, Guinevere, has gone to the convent, he has to give his sword back to the Lady of the Lake and so on.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enjoyed your perspective.    The end of Willy Wonka (book and both movies) has Willy blasting off in a glass elevator and a complete feel good warm fuzzy ending.     Is that what we what for the end of LOST?   Dancing around the fire with Obi-Wan/Anakin (the young or old one?)&amp; Yoda.   I sure didn&#8217;t get the sense from Dogan that he has a feel good role as the temple head.   The end I foresee will have satifing wrap up to many of the questions yet there will be darkness.   Like  the end of King Arther &#8211; The kingdom has been restored, yet his best friend, Lancelot, has betrayed him, his wife, Guinevere, has gone to the convent, he has to give his sword back to the Lady of the Lake and so on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack has a hickey</title>
		<link>http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-in-myth/marc-oromaner%e2%80%99s-lost-in-myth-why-lost-can-be-a-substitute-for-%e2%80%9cwilly-wonka%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-58823</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack has a hickey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 21:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.docarzt.com/?p=10002#comment-58823</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Agreed. 
I hope that if bring Michael back, they will just explain Walt and he not being on the plane because his mom never died or something. I would hate for them to stoop to recasting an important character like Walt.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed.<br />
I hope that if bring Michael back, they will just explain Walt and he not being on the plane because his mom never died or something. I would hate for them to stoop to recasting an important character like Walt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad Geri</title>
		<link>http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-in-myth/marc-oromaner%e2%80%99s-lost-in-myth-why-lost-can-be-a-substitute-for-%e2%80%9cwilly-wonka%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-58822</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad Geri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 21:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.docarzt.com/?p=10002#comment-58822</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree that Locke has often acted selfishly. I disagreed with a lot of what he did in late season 2 and season 3. But he&#039;s also suffered in the most profound ways and been robbed of the deepest human needs: a secure love (raised in foster care and his dad used him to get his kidney then cast him aside) and a significant purpose (a completely insignificant life made worse by the fact that he&#039;s stuck in a wheelchair). The island seemingly gives him these two things, then constantly teases him with the possibility that they could be taken away. He&#039;s so horribly afraid of this that it sometimes leads to selfish behavior. But if anyone has an &quot;excuse&quot; to act selfishly, it&#039;s Locke. I think that because of his INTENSELY traumatic background, he should be cut more than a little slack.

On the topic of Boone, Boone chose to go up into that plane. And when the plane started to shift Locke was crying out for Boone to get out but Boone ignored him. Boone&#039;s death was NOT Locke&#039;s fault.

Also, in Season 5, it seemed to me that Locke was trying to act in the interests of others. He checked on Walt and said, &quot;the boy&#039;s been through enough.&quot; He wasn&#039;t going to visit Sun because he had promised Jin he wouldn&#039;t, even though he would be violating what he was told to do. And finally he was prepared to die because he thought that might convince everyone to go back.

So in conclusion, I don&#039;t think Locke is a great, heroic guy. But I think he&#039;s been dealt a very raw deal, I think he&#039;s tried to do the best he can given this, and I pity him and want to see him redeemed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that Locke has often acted selfishly. I disagreed with a lot of what he did in late season 2 and season 3. But he&#8217;s also suffered in the most profound ways and been robbed of the deepest human needs: a secure love (raised in foster care and his dad used him to get his kidney then cast him aside) and a significant purpose (a completely insignificant life made worse by the fact that he&#8217;s stuck in a wheelchair). The island seemingly gives him these two things, then constantly teases him with the possibility that they could be taken away. He&#8217;s so horribly afraid of this that it sometimes leads to selfish behavior. But if anyone has an &#8220;excuse&#8221; to act selfishly, it&#8217;s Locke. I think that because of his INTENSELY traumatic background, he should be cut more than a little slack.</p>
<p>On the topic of Boone, Boone chose to go up into that plane. And when the plane started to shift Locke was crying out for Boone to get out but Boone ignored him. Boone&#8217;s death was NOT Locke&#8217;s fault.</p>
<p>Also, in Season 5, it seemed to me that Locke was trying to act in the interests of others. He checked on Walt and said, &#8220;the boy&#8217;s been through enough.&#8221; He wasn&#8217;t going to visit Sun because he had promised Jin he wouldn&#8217;t, even though he would be violating what he was told to do. And finally he was prepared to die because he thought that might convince everyone to go back.</p>
<p>So in conclusion, I don&#8217;t think Locke is a great, heroic guy. But I think he&#8217;s been dealt a very raw deal, I think he&#8217;s tried to do the best he can given this, and I pity him and want to see him redeemed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack's Sidekick</title>
		<link>http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-in-myth/marc-oromaner%e2%80%99s-lost-in-myth-why-lost-can-be-a-substitute-for-%e2%80%9cwilly-wonka%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-58801</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack's Sidekick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 18:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.docarzt.com/?p=10002#comment-58801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As much as we&#039;ve all enjoyed Locke&#039;s character, I&#039;ve always believed that he was really there to inspire Jack to believe. Think about it, before his death he wrote the note for Jack, &quot;I wish you had believed me.&quot; Locke tried for five seasons to make Jack a believer and that was the last thing he did. Maybe that&#039;s his redemption. Though, I&#039;m sure that if he doesn&#039;t come back, then he&#039;ll appear with one final message for Jack. Keep in mind there are two people on the show who can communicate with the dead: Hurley and Miles. I also think that MIB is going to be burdened with Locke&#039;s essence. The way he screamed to the kid, &quot;Don&#039;t tell me what I can&#039;t do!&quot; made me wonder if Locke&#039;s form is affecting him. I&#039;m not saying real Locke is taking over but if the smoke monster was always able to observe a person&#039;s memories and take their form when they&#039;re dead, then now that he&#039;s stuck in Locke&#039;s form, these memories are going to overflow and affect his judgment.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As much as we&#8217;ve all enjoyed Locke&#8217;s character, I&#8217;ve always believed that he was really there to inspire Jack to believe. Think about it, before his death he wrote the note for Jack, &#8220;I wish you had believed me.&#8221; Locke tried for five seasons to make Jack a believer and that was the last thing he did. Maybe that&#8217;s his redemption. Though, I&#8217;m sure that if he doesn&#8217;t come back, then he&#8217;ll appear with one final message for Jack. Keep in mind there are two people on the show who can communicate with the dead: Hurley and Miles. I also think that MIB is going to be burdened with Locke&#8217;s essence. The way he screamed to the kid, &#8220;Don&#8217;t tell me what I can&#8217;t do!&#8221; made me wonder if Locke&#8217;s form is affecting him. I&#8217;m not saying real Locke is taking over but if the smoke monster was always able to observe a person&#8217;s memories and take their form when they&#8217;re dead, then now that he&#8217;s stuck in Locke&#8217;s form, these memories are going to overflow and affect his judgment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jalocke</title>
		<link>http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-in-myth/marc-oromaner%e2%80%99s-lost-in-myth-why-lost-can-be-a-substitute-for-%e2%80%9cwilly-wonka%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-58797</link>
		<dc:creator>Jalocke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 17:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.docarzt.com/?p=10002#comment-58797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While thats all well and good, its hindsight. At the time Locke made a decision based on the apparation of a young boy. And Jack made a decision based off the good intentions of all the survivors. Locke doesn&#039;t care for any of those people and he didn&#039;t kill Naomi because of it. Why the hell should they have listened to Locke? He was only looking out for what he perceived to be his destiny. Maybe he was right? Who knows? But ultimately Keamy started killing people only after Locke decided to protect Ben Linus.... Ben? Psychopathic mass murderer Ben? Oh and if we want to use hindsight, Ben also turns out to be that guy who killed Jacob. So let&#039;s put this all together. Locke kills Naomi because the island told him that the freighter folk were bad. Then creates a situation, by protecting Ben, where this prophecy comes true. Had they all just co-operated, they would have stood a much better chance of safely going home.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While thats all well and good, its hindsight. At the time Locke made a decision based on the apparation of a young boy. And Jack made a decision based off the good intentions of all the survivors. Locke doesn&#8217;t care for any of those people and he didn&#8217;t kill Naomi because of it. Why the hell should they have listened to Locke? He was only looking out for what he perceived to be his destiny. Maybe he was right? Who knows? But ultimately Keamy started killing people only after Locke decided to protect Ben Linus&#8230;. Ben? Psychopathic mass murderer Ben? Oh and if we want to use hindsight, Ben also turns out to be that guy who killed Jacob. So let&#8217;s put this all together. Locke kills Naomi because the island told him that the freighter folk were bad. Then creates a situation, by protecting Ben, where this prophecy comes true. Had they all just co-operated, they would have stood a much better chance of safely going home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitchy</title>
		<link>http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-in-myth/marc-oromaner%e2%80%99s-lost-in-myth-why-lost-can-be-a-substitute-for-%e2%80%9cwilly-wonka%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-58790</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitchy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 16:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.docarzt.com/?p=10002#comment-58790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, i don&#039;t question Locke&#039;s intentions: i know his reasons to kill Naomi are related to the safety of the Losties. I do question Locke&#039;s means.
What I was arguing is the point of Locke possibly being a Christ-like figure, who makes sacrifices for the common good. Again: Locke doesn&#039;t sacrifice himself at all, he sacrifices other people&#039;s lives and will! He makes violence to people.

What about the submarine, for instance? Jack could have well left the island hadn&#039;t Locke blown it up.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, i don&#8217;t question Locke&#8217;s intentions: i know his reasons to kill Naomi are related to the safety of the Losties. I do question Locke&#8217;s means.<br />
What I was arguing is the point of Locke possibly being a Christ-like figure, who makes sacrifices for the common good. Again: Locke doesn&#8217;t sacrifice himself at all, he sacrifices other people&#8217;s lives and will! He makes violence to people.</p>
<p>What about the submarine, for instance? Jack could have well left the island hadn&#8217;t Locke blown it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: naultz</title>
		<link>http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-in-myth/marc-oromaner%e2%80%99s-lost-in-myth-why-lost-can-be-a-substitute-for-%e2%80%9cwilly-wonka%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-58789</link>
		<dc:creator>naultz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 16:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.docarzt.com/?p=10002#comment-58789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John locke killed naomi to try to prevent the frieghter people from killing everyone on the island not for sport or personal gain.  i think you have forgotten what happened to all the islanders after keamy and his gang came to the island. killing everyone in there path until ben and locke were forced to move the island to protect the people that were still left alive.  if locke had succeeded in killing naomi, the sat phone would have not been fixed and maybe the losties could have prevented ever having to move the island. unfortunately no one believed Locke and all of the craziness insued including the first time jump when most of the 815&#039;s died from flaming arrows.  that is jacks fault, not lockes]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John locke killed naomi to try to prevent the frieghter people from killing everyone on the island not for sport or personal gain.  i think you have forgotten what happened to all the islanders after keamy and his gang came to the island. killing everyone in there path until ben and locke were forced to move the island to protect the people that were still left alive.  if locke had succeeded in killing naomi, the sat phone would have not been fixed and maybe the losties could have prevented ever having to move the island. unfortunately no one believed Locke and all of the craziness insued including the first time jump when most of the 815&#8242;s died from flaming arrows.  that is jacks fault, not lockes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jalocke</title>
		<link>http://www.docarzt.com/lost/lost-in-myth/marc-oromaner%e2%80%99s-lost-in-myth-why-lost-can-be-a-substitute-for-%e2%80%9cwilly-wonka%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-58778</link>
		<dc:creator>Jalocke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 14:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.docarzt.com/?p=10002#comment-58778</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jughead is actually the perfect example. Why did Jack set off Jughead? Because it could reset all the terrible things that had happened. How is that not an admirable thing to want? Boone, Charlie, Shannon and countless others still alive. The plane never crashes, pilots aren&#039;t killed. Sons and fathers are not seperated. Sure we can say that it was also partially because maybe he wanted to erase the misery that was his relationship with Kate, but I don&#039;t think so. Here was an opportunity to save countless lives. And thats ultimately why his friends helped him. Numerous people called into question why Sawyer, Kate, Juliet, etc. suddenly changed their minds when trying to stop Jack. Well I thought it was quite clear. In the end, it felt comfortable to follow Jack. He had sometimes made mistakes but he had always had the best intentions and everyone knew that. From the beginning, they could follow Jack because well, he was ultimately a good guy and amidst the craziness of time travel, wacky others, and nuclear bombs, here was a guy who was just trying to do the right thing, and even if it was a total screw up well, that was at least worth dying for.

Locke? Well as Rose so nicely put it, (roughly), &quot;I&#039;m not going anywhere with that madman.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jughead is actually the perfect example. Why did Jack set off Jughead? Because it could reset all the terrible things that had happened. How is that not an admirable thing to want? Boone, Charlie, Shannon and countless others still alive. The plane never crashes, pilots aren&#8217;t killed. Sons and fathers are not seperated. Sure we can say that it was also partially because maybe he wanted to erase the misery that was his relationship with Kate, but I don&#8217;t think so. Here was an opportunity to save countless lives. And thats ultimately why his friends helped him. Numerous people called into question why Sawyer, Kate, Juliet, etc. suddenly changed their minds when trying to stop Jack. Well I thought it was quite clear. In the end, it felt comfortable to follow Jack. He had sometimes made mistakes but he had always had the best intentions and everyone knew that. From the beginning, they could follow Jack because well, he was ultimately a good guy and amidst the craziness of time travel, wacky others, and nuclear bombs, here was a guy who was just trying to do the right thing, and even if it was a total screw up well, that was at least worth dying for.</p>
<p>Locke? Well as Rose so nicely put it, (roughly), &#8220;I&#8217;m not going anywhere with that madman.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 711/768 objects using xcache

 Served from: www.docarzt.com @ 2013-05-23 10:04:45 by W3 Total Cache -->